Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 16;90(1079):20170361. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170361

Table 4.

Table comparing the unfavourable sites of involvement among patients who underwent CC and MTD for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

Unfavourable sites Site (n) CC (n = 22) MTD (n = 12) p value
Epigastric region Lesser omentum – 10 4 (18.1%) 6 (50%) 0.062
Disease around left lobe of liver – 3 2 (9%) 1 (8.2%) 0.721
Perigastric disease – 5 1 (4.5%) 4 (33.3%) 0.042
Porta hepatis – 8 4 (18.1%) 4 (33.3%) 0.279
CBD obstruction – 0 0 (0) 0 (0)  
Paraduodenal disease – 0 0 (0) 0 (0)  
Liver involvement – 1 0 (0) 1 (8.2%)  
Splenic involvement – 2 0 (0) 2 (16.6%)  
Mesentery and small bowel Mesentery – 24 14 (63.6%) 10 (83.3%) 0.211
Root of mesentery – 0 0 (0) 0 (0)  
Small bowel – 16 7 (33.3%) 9 (75%) 0.019
Retroperitoneum Hydronephrosis – 1 0 (0) 1 (8.2%)  
Bladder trigone – 1 0 (0) 1 (8.2%)  
Pelvic side wall – 0 0 (0) 0 (0)  
Lymphnodes Retroperitoneum and abdomen – 1 0 (0) 1 (8.2%) 0.279
Epiphrenic – 8 4 (18.1%) 4 (33.3%)
Concurrent intrathoracic disease Pleural effusion and pleural nodules – 2 0 (0) 2 (16.6%)  
Abdominal wall disease Abdominal wall nodules – 4 2 (9%) 2 (16.6%) 0.444