Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 9;90(1079):20170266. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170266

Table 2.

Results of image guidance accuracy for pelvis phantom

CBCT imaging position Phantom location on couch top Actual physical shifts Difference between actual and calculated shifts Residual errors based on verification CBCT images    
Translation (mm) Rotation (°) Translation (mm) Rotation (°)
2 CCV 5 mm & 0.5° 0.75 0.40 0.41 0.20
2 CCV 10 mm & 1° 0.42 0.30 0.37 0.40
2 CCV 20 mm & 2° 0.41 0.30 0.22 0.20
2 CCV−30 5 mm & 0.5° 0.22 0.10 0.22 0.10
2 CCV−30 10 mm & 1° 0.62 0.10 0.00 0.10
2 CCV−30 20 mm & 2° 0.51 0.30 0.76 0.00

CBCT, cone beam CT; CCV, centre of the calibrated volume; CCV, CCV−30, translation error, and rotation error are defined as in Table 1. The CCV +50 location was not tested, because it is unlikely to position the patient’s pelvis near the superior end of the couch top.

Scan protocol parameters were 360° acquisition, 125 kV, 42 mA, 20 ms, 10 frames per seconds, 1024 × 1024 reconstruction matrix, 0.52-mm pixel size, and 1-mm slice thickness.