Table 2.
Results of image guidance accuracy for pelvis phantom
CBCT imaging position | Phantom location on couch top | Actual physical shifts | Difference between actual and calculated shifts | Residual errors based on verification CBCT images | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Translation (mm) | Rotation (°) | Translation (mm) | Rotation (°) | |||
2 | CCV | 5 mm & 0.5° | 0.75 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.20 |
2 | CCV | 10 mm & 1° | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.40 |
2 | CCV | 20 mm & 2° | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.20 |
2 | CCV−30 | 5 mm & 0.5° | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.10 |
2 | CCV−30 | 10 mm & 1° | 0.62 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
2 | CCV−30 | 20 mm & 2° | 0.51 | 0.30 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
CBCT, cone beam CT; CCV, centre of the calibrated volume; CCV, CCV−30, translation error, and rotation error are defined as in Table 1. The CCV +50 location was not tested, because it is unlikely to position the patient’s pelvis near the superior end of the couch top.
Scan protocol parameters were 360° acquisition, 125 kV, 42 mA, 20 ms, 10 frames per seconds, 1024 × 1024 reconstruction matrix, 0.52-mm pixel size, and 1-mm slice thickness.