Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Health Educ Behav. 2015 Oct 29;43(5):568–576. doi: 10.1177/1090198115611877

Table 3.

Past-year CRC Screening among Intervention Participants Eligible for Screening

Process Outcome Variables Screening in Past
Year (%)
P-value

Recalled receiving ACTS newsletters 0.0198
    No (n=17) 17.7
    Yes (n=82) 43.9

Reported number of newsletters received 0.8265
    1 (n=7) 28.6
    2 (n=23) 34.8
    3 (n=21) 61.9
    4 (n=6) 66.7
    More than 4 (n=5) 0.0
    Don’t Know (n=20) 45.0

Recalled that newsletters mentioned CRC screening 0.0658
    No (n=29) 34.5
    Yes (n=53) 49.1

Spoke with a Peer Counselor 0.1349
    No (n=67) 32.8
    Yes (n=23) 52.2

Recalled discussing CRC screening with Peer Counselor 0.7847
    No (n=9) 55.7
    Yes (n=14) 50.0

Watched DVD with Decision Aid 0.6397
    No (n=81) 38.3
    Yes (n=18) 44.4

Recalled ACTS of Wellness Events at Church 0.893
    No (n=87) 39.1
    Yes (n=12) 41.7

NOTE: This table only includes intervention participants who were eligible for screening during the intervention period (n=99). All comparisons are adjusted for clustering within churches.