. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 22.

Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Feb 8;58(2):501–510. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00397

Table 4.

Performance Comparison of ATPbind, ATPseq, TM-SITEatp, and S-SITEatp on PATP-388 over 5-Fold Cross-Validation Tests

predictor	Sen (%)	Spe (%)	Acc (%)	Pre (%)	MCC	AUC
S-SITEatp	69.88	94.47	93.53	33.47	0.455	N/A^a
TM-SITEatp	73.64	95.29	94.46	38.37	0.507	N/A
ATPseq	57.52	98.86	97.27	66.69	0.605	0.913
ATPbind	64.04	98.88	97.55	69.57	0.655	0.932

”N/A” means that the corresponding value could not be computed.