eTable 3. Methodological quality of included systematic reviews.
Citation | 1. Was an ‘a priori’ design provided? |
2. Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction by two independent reviewers? |
3. Was a comprehensive and systematic literature search performed? |
4. Were unpublished study data as well as grey literature appropriately considered? |
5. Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided? |
6. Were the characteristics (patient characteristics. interventions outcomes) of the included studies_provided? |
7. Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? |
8. Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? |
9. Were the methods appropriate that were used to combine the findings of studies? |
10. Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? |
11. Was the conflict of interest included? |
Abdullatif (2016) (e11) |
No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Ahrens (2011) (e12) |
No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No *2 | No | No | NA | No | No |
Bartolucci (2016) (e13) |
No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Bratton (2015) (e14) |
Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Bridgman (2000) (e15) |
No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | No | No |
Caldas (2009) (e16) |
No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | NA | No | No |
Camacho (2015) (e17) |
No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Caples (2010) (e18) |
Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Carvalho (2007. 2016) (e19, e20) |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No |
Health Quality Ontario (2009) (e21) |
No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Hoekema (2004) (e22) |
No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Holty (2010) (e23) |
No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Hsieh and Liao (2013) (e24) |
No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | No | No |
Huynh (2016) (e25) |
Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No *3 | Yes | No | No | No |
Knudsen (2015) (e26) |
No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Li (2013) (e27) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Lim (2004) (e28) |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
Machado-Júnior (2016) (e29) |
No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Marcus (2012) (e30) |
No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | n.a. | No | No |
Marklund (2012) (e31) |
No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | n.a. | No | No |
Nazarali (2015) (e32) |
No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Okuno (2014) (e33) |
No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Pirklbauer (2011) (e34) |
No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | n.a. | No | No |
Ramar (2015) (e35) |
No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Serra-Torres (2016) (e36) |
No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | n.a. | No | No |
Sharples (2016) (e37) |
No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Sher (1996) (e38) *1 |
Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | n.a. | No | No |
Zaghi (2016) (e39) |
No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No *4 | No |
Zhu (2015) (e40) |
No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
NA. not applicable.
*1 Data extracted only on MMA
*2 Dead link
*3 Inappropriate tool
*4 Funnel-like plot provided. but no statistical confirmation