Skip to main content
. 2017 Winter;16(Suppl):75–82.

Table 3.

Effect of glibenclamide and MSLA on the lipid profile of alloxan-induced diabetic rats

Group Treatment Total cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Teriglycerides
(mg/dl)
LDL (mg/dl) HDL (mg/dl)
1. Normal saline (10 mL/kg) 63.75±5.54 50.00±6.89 47.90±4.43 48.00±2.87
2. Diabetic control (150 mg/kg) 180.66±5.54# 155.00±15.56# 105.66±9.13# 44.00±7.37
3. Glibenclamide (2 mg/kg) 75.5±2.23* 81.83±7.19* 17.46±3.97* 41.66±2.99
4. MSLA (300 mg/kg) 95.66±4.75*a 89.83±5.26* 26.20±5.10* 51.50±3.58a

Data are mean ± SEM, n=24. One-way ANOVA+Tukey test against hypercholesterolemic rats

#

P<0.0001 Diabetic control rats were compared with normal control rats.

*

P<0.0001 Diabetic treated rats were compared with diabetic control rats.

a

P<0.05 Diabetic treated rats with MSLA were compared with Diabetic treated rats with glinenclamide.