Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;18(4):1–141.

Table 36:

Deterministic Scenario Analysis Results—MRgFUS Neurosurgery vs. Radiofrequency Thalamotomy or Deep Brain Stimulation

MRgFUS vs. RF DBS vs. MRgFUS
Incremental Cost Incremental QALYs ICER Incremental Cost Incremental QALYs ICER
Reference case $8,530 0.08 $109,795 $34,028 0.25 $134,259
Societal perspective $7,948 0.08 $102,305 $35,815 0.25 $141,310
Time horizon
   1 year $7,980 0.01 $546,289 $19,996 0.07 $297,776
   10 years $8,925 0.14 $63,579 $45,855 0.51 $90,486
Including capital cost of MRgFUS $29,428 0.08 $378,806 $13,129 0.25 $51,803
Reducing post-surgery recovery cost of MRgFUS $4,178 0.08 $53,775 $38,380 0.25 $151,430
Reducing MRI scan cost for all surgeries $8,530 0.08 $109,795 $33,886 0.25 $133,702
Utility of mild to moderate improvement post-surgery (0.71, based on Herceg et al, 201283) $8,530 0.07 $115,288 $34,028 0.23 $145,485
Probability of recurrence in year 1 for MRgFUS and RF (11%, based on Zaaroor et al, 201745) $8,541 0.08 $110,090 $33,998 0.26 $131,715
Probability of recurrence over 5 years for MRgFUS (50%, based on expert opinion) $10,211 0.02 $410,779 $32,346 0.31 $105,612
Surgical effectiveness (based on Kim et al, 201746) $8,554 0.04 $196,484 $34,023 0.26 $128,867

Abbreviations: DBS, deep brain stimulation; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; MRgFUS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; RF, radiofrequency; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.