Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Processes. 2018 Mar 30;151:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.022

Table 1.

Mean (SEM) start and stop times for each group before and after the DRL intervention.

Start Time (s)

Group Pre-DRL Post-DRL Session



Avg. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
DRL 9 11.8 25.7* 17.7 13.14 13.4 11.9 11.4 12.5 12.5 11.2 12.5
(1.4) (2.7) (1.7) (3.03) (2.2) (1.8) (1.3) (1.9) (1.9) (2.4) (2.2)
DRL 18 11.4 30.3* 26.7* 19.8 12.9 12.2 12.8 13.6 14.8 11.1 11.7
(1.3) (3.2) (3.1) (2.1) (1.3) (2.1) (2.5) (0.6) (1.9) (1.8) (1.6)
DRL 27 10.8 30.1* 25.9* 22.9* 15.3 14.2 14.1 14.4 14.3 15.2 12.7
(1.0) (3.5) (4.5) (4.4) (3.3) (2.9) (2.2) (1.9) (3.0) (3.3) (3.2)
PI 18 9.97 8.6 12.7 9.2 8.8 10.3 9.9 9.6 8.8 8.9 10.7
(0.8) (1.0) (1.8) (1.3) (0.6) (1.4) (0.7) (1.6) (1.1) (0.9) (0.5)
Stop Time (s)

Group Pre-DRL Post-DRL Session



Avg. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
DRL 9 34.2 36.7 35.3 34.1 34.5 34.2 33.4 33.8 33.9 32.1 35.3
(1.6) (1.7) (1.1) (1.5) (1.2) (1.2) (1.3) (1.5) (1.4) (1.7) (1.0)
DRL 18 32.9 38.1 40.7 40.2 35.4 35.2 36.8 37.3 36.8 33.8 34.1
(1.2) (2.3) (1.6) (1.3) (0.9) (1.4) (1.7) (1.4) (2.2) (1.3 (0.9)
DRL 27 34.0 36.8 36.7 38.7 36.3 36.9 38.3 38.9 37.7 39.1 37.9
(1.3) (1.6) (2.1) (1.7) (1.5) (2.2) (2.2) (1.6) (3.7) (2.8) (2.8)
PI 18 33.2 32.5 36.8 33.5 32.4 32.7 33.8 34.8 31.5 30.8 32.8
(0.7) (1.6) (2.2) (1.5) (1.5) (1.5) (1.6) (1.9) (1.4) (1.1) (1.2)

Note.

*

indicates p < .05 as compared to the mean start or stop time from the Pre-DRL Phase.