Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;24:2946–2969. doi: 10.12659/MSM.909995

Table 4.

STRICTA assessment of the reporting characteristics of included studies (N=30; 24 studies from Chinese journals; 6 studies from English journals).

Section/ topic Item Description Positive studies Positive Chinese journals Positive English journals
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Acupuncture rationale 1a Style of acupuncture (e.g. Traditional Chinese Medicine, Japanese, Korean, Western medical, Five Element, ear acupuncture, etc) 30 (100) 24 (100%) 6 (100%)
1b Reasoning for treatment provided, historical context, literature sources, and/or consensus methods, with references provided wherever necessary 9 (30) 5 (21) 4 (67)*
1c Extent to which treatment varied 2 (7) 0 (0) 2 (33)*
Details of needling 2a Number of needle insertions per subject per session (mean and range wherever relevant) 23 (77) 20 (83) 3 (50)
2b Names (or location if no standard name) of points used (uni/bilateral) 30 (100) 24 (24) 6 (100)
2c Depth of insertion, based on a specified unit of measurement or a particular tissue level 20 (67) 15 (63) 5 (83)
2d Response sought (e.g. de qi or muscle twitch response) 23 (77) 17 (71) 6 (100)
2e Needle stimulation (e.g. manual, electrical) 29 (97) 23 (96) 6 (100)
2f Needle retention time 29 (97) 23 (96) 6 (100)
2g Needle type (diameter, length, and manufacturer or material) 22 (73) 16 (67) 6 (100)
Treatment regimen 3a Number of treatment sessions 30 (100) 24 (100) 6 (100)
3b Frequency and duration of treatment sessions 30 (100) 24 (100) 6 (100)
Other components of treatment 4a Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group (e.g. moxibustion, cupping, herbs, exercises, lifestyle modification advice) 10 (33) 5 (21) 5 (83)*
4b Setting and context of treatment, including instructions to practitioners, and information to patients 1 (3) 0 (0) 1 (17)
Practitioner background 5 Description of participating acupuncturists (qualification or professional affiliation, years in acupuncture practice and other relevant experience) 1 (3) 0 (0) 1 (17)
Control or comparator interventions 6a Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question and sources justifying the choice 2 (7) 0 (0) 2 (33)*
6b Precise description of the control or comparator. If sham acupuncture or any other type of acupuncture-like control is used, provide details as for Items 1 to 3 above 28 (93) 22 (92) 6 (100)
*

Indicates a significant difference with the studies published in Chinese journals.