Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2016 Nov 27;429(3):426–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.022

Table 1.

Summary of correlation coefficients between predicted and experimental ΔΔG values by different scoring functions

Nmuta Nsam b CFol c CBeA d CDco e CPro f CProFol g CBinX h
1 1131 0.457 0.272 0.056 0.675 0.738 0.738
2 195 0.178 −0.057 0.459 0.425 0.459
3 or more 76 0.046 0.015 0.406 0.319 0.406
All mixed 1402 0.445 0.183 0.651 0.658 0.691
a

Nmut: number of mutations involved in each sample.

b

Nsam: number of mutation samples.

c

CFol: correlation coefficient by FoldX.

d

CBeA: correlation coefficient by BeAtMuSic.

e

CDco: correlation coefficient by Dcomplex.

f

CPro: Correlation coefficient using Profile-score.

g

CProFol: correlation coefficient by profile-score + FoldX.

h

CBinX: Correlation coefficient by BindProfX that uses combined score (profile-score + FoldX) for single-mutation and profile-score for multiple-mutations.