Table 1.
Study 1: condition statistics and tests of significant between-condition differences.
| Hopes | Duties | Tests of between–condition differences | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Word type | Examples | M | SD | M | SD | df | t | Mean diff. | 95% CI | d |
| HOPES HIGHER | ||||||||||
| Analytical/categorical vs. dynamic | a | 69.01 | 28.30 | 53.94 | 32.77 | 588.19 | 6.04 | 15.07 | [10.17, 19.98] | 0.49 |
| Emotional tone | b | 61.77 | 34.27 | 43.13 | 34.48 | 599.00 | 6.64 | 18.63 | [13.13, 24.14] | 0.54 |
| Positive emotion | Love, nice, sweet | 3.82 | 4.32 | 2.27 | 3.06 | 536.24 | 5.09 | 1.56 | [0.96, 2.16] | 0.42 |
| Achievement | Win, success, better | 4.38 | 5.38 | 2.38 | 3.85 | 539.66 | 5.24 | 2.00 | [1.25, 2.75] | 0.43 |
| Reward | Take, prize, benefit | 3.56 | 5.06 | 1.80 | 2.83 | 466.50 | 5.24 | 1.75 | [1.10, 2.41] | 0.43 |
| Work | Job, majors, xerox | 9.72 | 9.27 | 5.88 | 6.55 | 535.95 | 5.87 | 3.84 | [2.56, 5.13] | 0.48 |
| Leisure | Cook, chat, movie | 2.89 | 5.64 | 0.90 | 2.09 | 377.53 | 5.73 | 1.99 | [1.31, 2.67] | 0.47 |
| DUTIES HIGHER | ||||||||||
| Clout/status | c | 24.73 | 23.57 | 34.59 | 30.00 | 569.65 | −4.48 | −9.86 | [−14.19, −5.54] | −0.37 |
| Words per sentence | – | 15.52 | 6.68 | 18.26 | 8.05 | 599.00 | −4.53 | −2.73 | [−3.92, −1.55] | −0.37 |
| Total function words | It, to, no, very | 53.33 | 10.33 | 58.40 | 8.46 | 599.00 | −6.58 | −5.07 | [−6.58, −3.55] | −0.54 |
| Total pronouns | I, them, itself | 15.54 | 7.13 | 19.24 | 6.93 | 599.00 | −6.45 | −3.70 | [−4.83, −2.57] | −0.53 |
| Personal pronouns | I, them, her | 12.31 | 6.02 | 14.80 | 6.02 | 599.00 | −5.07 | −2.49 | [−3.46, −1.53] | −0.41 |
| Third person singular | She, her, him | 0.20 | 1.07 | 1.86 | 3.48 | 358.05 | −7.93 | −1.66 | [−2.08, -1.25] | −0.65 |
| Conjunctions | And, but, whereas | 4.69 | 4.05 | 6.62 | 4.47 | 599.00 | −5.55 | −1.93 | [−2.62, -1.25] | −0.45 |
| Negations | No, not, never | 0.42 | 1.10 | 1.27 | 2.13 | 452.50 | −6.16 | −0.85 | [−1.12, −0.57] | −0.50 |
| Negative emotion | Hurt, ugly, nasty | 0.41 | 1.37 | 1.53 | 2.95 | 426.97 | −5.98 | −1.12 | [−1.49, −0.75] | −0.49 |
| Social processes | Mate, talk, they | 4.39 | 6.23 | 9.82 | 8.70 | 545.33 | −8.82 | −5.44 | [−6.65, −4.22] | −0.72 |
| Family | Daughter, dad, aunt | 0.70 | 2.64 | 2.01 | 3.65 | 548.25 | −5.04 | −1.31 | [−1.82, −0.80] | −0.41 |
| Friends | Buddy, neighbor | 0.15 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 2.70 | 371.71 | −4.63 | −0.76 | [−1.09, −0.48] | −0.38 |
| Female references | Girl, her, mom | 0.31 | 1.60 | 2.03 | 4.30 | 383.37 | −6.49 | −1.72 | [−2.24, −1.19] | −0.53 |
| Male references | Boy, his, dad | 0.41 | 1.70 | 1.38 | 3.54 | 433.92 | −4.29 | −0.97 | [−1.41, −0.52] | −0.35 |
| Differentiation | Hasn't, but, else | 1.31 | 2.35 | 2.67 | 3.48 | 528.34 | −5.66 | −1.37 | [−1.84, −0.89] | −0.46 |
| Affiliation | Ally, friend, social | 1.45 | 3.06 | 3.39 | 5.24 | 486.33 | −5.55 | −1.94 | [−2.63, −1.25] | −0.45 |
To limit the potential for false-positive results, I set a conservative limit for inclusion in this table at p < 0.001, two-tailed, and d ≥ 0.35. Degrees of freedom are adjusted for heterogeneity of variance. Mean values indicate the mean percentage of all of the words that participants used that fell into a particular category, except the mean values for words per sentence and the summary variables (analytical thinking, tone, and clout).
The analytical/categorical thinking variable is by Pennebaker et al. (2014).
The emotional tone variable is by Cohn et al. (2004).
The clout/status variable is by Kacewicz et al. (2013).