Table 3.
Effect estimates, event rates, and NNTs of meta-analyses examining medical cannabinoids versus placebo or other antiemetics for nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy (or in palliative patients for Mücke et al19)
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | OUTCOME (COMPARISON) | NO. OF RCTS (NO. OF PARTICIPANTS) | AUTHORS’ META-ANALYSIS RESULT (95% CI), HETEROGENEITY | META-ANALYSIS RE-ANALYZED (95% CI), HETEROGENEITY | CANNABINOID EVENT RATE, % | CONTROL EVENT RATE, % | NNT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whiting et al, 20152 | Nausea and vomiting—complete response (vs placebo) | 3 (102) | OR = 3.82 (1.55 to 9.42), I2 = 0% | RR = 2.43 (1.30 to 4.52), I2 = 0% | 47 | 20 | 4 |
Smith et al, 201525 | Absence of nausea and vomiting (vs placebo) | 3 (288) | RR = 2.86 (1.76 to 4.65), I2 = 0% | NA | 37 | 12 | 4 |
Patient preference (vs placebo) | 2 (256) | RR = 4.82 (1.74 to 13.36), I2 = 69% | NA | 72 | 18 | 2 | |
Absence of nausea and vomiting (vs prochlorperazine) | 4 (414) | RR = 2.00 (0.74 to 5.38), I2 = 60% | NA | 20 | 11 | NS | |
Patient preference (vs other drugs) | 9 (799) | RR = 2.76 (1.88 to 4.03), I2 = 61% | NA | 63 | 19 | 3 | |
Mücke et al, 201619 | Improvement in nausea and vomiting symptoms (vs placebo)* | 2 (307) | SMD = 0.20 (−0.03 to 0.44), I2 = 0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Machado Rocha et al, 200826 | Nausea and vomiting within 1 d of chemotherapy (dronabinol vs placebo) | 2 (185) | RR = 0.47 (0.19 to 1.16), I2 = 91% | NA | 40 | 87 | NS |
Nausea and vomiting within 1 d of chemotherapy (dronabinol vs neuroleptics) | 5 (325) | RR = 0.67 (0.47 to 0.96), I2 = 79% | NA | 52 | 80 | 4 | |
Nausea and vomiting within 1 d of chemotherapy (nabilone vs neuroleptics) | 6 (277) | RR = 0.88 (0.72 to 1.08), I2 = 64% | NA | 75 | 85 | NS | |
Tramèr et al, 200127 | Control of nausea (vs placebo) | 4 (231) | RelR = 1.21 (1.03 to 1.42), I2 = NR | NA | 70 | 57 | 8 |
Control of vomiting (vs placebo) | 4 (231) | RelR = 1.84 (1.42 to 2.38), I2 = NR | NA | 66 | 36 | 4 | |
Control of nausea (vs antiemetic) | 7 (422) | RelR = 1.38 (1.18 to 1.62), I2 = NR | NA | 59 | 43 | 7 | |
Control of vomiting (vs antiemetic) | 6 (395) | RelR = 1.28 (1.08 to 1.51), I2 = NR | NA | 57 | 45 | 9 | |
Patient preference (vs placebo) | 4 (404) | RelR = 5.67 (3.95 to 8.15), I2 = NR | NA | 76 | 13 | 2 | |
Patient preference (vs antiemetic) | 14 (1212) | RelR = 2.39 (2.05 to 2.78), I2 = NR | NA | 61 | 26 | 3 | |
All studies | Control of nausea and vomiting (vs placebo) | 7 (500) | NA | RR = 3.60 (2.55 to 5.09), I2 = 18% | 47 | 13 | 3 |
Control of nausea and vomiting (vs antiemetics) | 14 (1022) | NA | RR = 1.85 (1.18 to 2.91), I2 = 60% | 31 | 16 | 7 |
NA—not applicable, NNT—number needed to treat, NR—not reported, NS—not significant, OR—odds ratio, RCT—randomized controlled trial, RelR—relative risk, RR—risk ratio, SMD—standardized mean difference.
This was for palliative patients (1 HIV RCT and 1 refractory cancer pain RCT).