Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb;64(2):e78–e94.

Table 5.

Effect estimates, event rates, and NNHs of meta-analyses examining medical cannabinoids versus placebo for adverse events

TYPE OF ADVERSE EVENT STUDY NO. OF RCTS (NO. OF PARTICIPANTS) RELATIVE EFFECT ESTIMATE (95% CI), HETEROGENEITY RE-ANALYSIS EFFECT ESTIMATE (95% CI), HETEROGENEITY CANNABINOID EVENT RATE PLACEBO EVENT RATE NNH
Overall Lobos Urbina and Peña Duran, 201617 NR OR = 3.03 (2.42 to 3.80), I2 = 44% NA 92% 78% 8
Meza et al, 201729 4 (1025) RR = 1.18 (1.10 to 1.27), I2 = NR NA NR NR NA
Wade et al, 201028 3 (666) NR RR = 1.42 (1.27 to 1.59),* NA 79% 56% 5
Wang et al, 200830 23 (2068) Rate ratio of 1.86 (1.57 to 2.21), I2 = 87% NA 10.4 per patient-year 6.9 per patient-year NA
Whiting et al, 20152 29 (3714) OR = 3.03 (2.42 to 3.80), I2 = 31% RR = 1.30 (1.21 to 1.39), I2 = 53% 81% 62% 6
Serious Mücke et al, 201619 6 (1031) RR = 1.15 (0.88 to 1.49), I2 = NR NA 26% 17% NS
Petzke et al, 201616 11 (1568) RD = 1% (−1% to 3%), I2 = NR NA 6.3% 17% NS
Wang et al, 200830 23 (2068) Rate ratio 1.04 (0.78 to 1.39), I2 = NR NA 0.37 per patient-year 0.25 per patient-year NA
Whiting et al, 20152 34 (3248) OR = 1.41 (1.04 to 1.92), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Withdrawal Smith et al, 201525 2 (276) RR = 6.85 (1.96 to 23.99), I2 = 0% NA 14% 1% 8
Tramèr et al, 200127 19 (1111) RelR = 4.67 (3.07 to 7.09), I2 = NR NA 11% 2% 11
Mücke et al, 201619 6 (1031) RR = 1.20 (0.85 to 1.71), I2 = NR NA 15% 11% NS
Petzke et al, 201616 11 (1574) RD = 0.04 (0.01 to 0.07), I2 = 22% RR = 2.03 (1.43 to 2.88), I2 = 0% 11% 5% 19
Iskedjian et al, 200718 7 (508 observations) NA NA 4.3% 3.6% NA
Koppel et al, 201431 24 (2737) NR NA 7% 2% 22
Wade et al, 201028 3 (666) NR RR = 3.04 (1.59 to 5.81),* NA 11% 4% 14
Whiting et al, 20152 23 (2755) OR = 2.94 (2.18 to 3.96), I2 = 2% NA NR NR NA
Sedation Smith et al, 201525 2 (139) RR = 4.47 (0.35 to 57.81), I2 = 72% NA 59% 25% NS
Tramèr et al, 200127 15 (1373) RelR = 1.66 (1.46 to 1.89), I2 = NR NA 50% 30% 5
Whiting et al, 20152 26 (3168) OR = 2.83 (2.05 to 3.91) I2 = 27% NA NR NR NA
“Feeling high” Smith et al, 201525 3 (137) RR = 31.10 (6.37 to 151.85), I2 = 0% NA 70% 0% 2
Tramèr et al, 200127 8 (1032) RelR = 10.6 (6.86 to 16.5), I2 = NR NA 35% 3% 4
Dysphoria Smith et al, 201525 2 (96) RR = 9.00 (0.50 to 160.59), I2 = NA NA 8% 0% NS
Tramèr et al, 200127 10 (690) RelR = 8.06 (3.38 to −19.2), I2 = NR NA 13% 0.3% 8
Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 4 (343) OR = 2.56 (0.66 to 9.92), I2 = 0% RR = 2.85 (0.74 to 10.93), I2 = 0% 4% 1% NS
Euphoria Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 4 (202) OR = 4.11 (1.33 to 12.72), I2 = 0% RR = 3.67 (1.02 to 13.13), I2 = 0% 15% 2% 9
Whiting et al, 20152 27 (2420) OR = 4.08 (2.18 to 7.64), I2 = 49% NA NR NR NA
Blurred vision or visual hallucination Tramèr et al, 200127 10 (859) RelR = 6.10 (2.41 to 15.4), I2 = NR NA 6% 0% 17
Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 5 (296) OR = 8.34 (4.63 to 15.03), I2 = 0% RR = 4.93 (2.54 to 9.58), I2 = 0% 44% 8% 3
Whiting et al, 20152 10 (898) OR = 2.19 (1.02 to 4.68), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Tinnitus Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 2 (152) OR = 2.18 (0.93 to 5.11), I2 = 0% RR = 2.11 (0.69 to 6.41), I2 = 0% 16% 7% NS
Disorientation or confusion Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 5 (508) OR = 3.24 (1.51 to 6.97), I2 = 0% RR = 2.85 (1.25 to 6.47), I2 = 0% 9% 2% 15
Whiting et al, 20152 12 (1736) OR = 5.41 (2.61 to 11.19), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Dissociation or acute psychosis Tramèr et al, 200127 6 (571) RelR = 8.58 (6.38 to 11.5), I2 = NR NA 5% 0% 20
Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 4 (277) OR = 3.18 (0.89 to 11.33), I2 = 0% RR = 3.96 (0.90 to 17.40), I2 = 0% 5% 0% NS (20)
Whiting et al, 20152 2 (37) OR = 1.09 (0.07 to 16.35), I2 = 25% NA NR NR NA
Speech disorders Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 3 (200) OR = 4.13 (2.08 to 8.20), I2 = 0% RR = 2.91 (1.28 to 6.64), I2 = 0% 32% 7% 5
Ataxia or muscle twitching Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 6 (540) OR = 3.84 (2.49 to 5.92), I2 = 39% RR = 2.43 (1.61 to 3.67), I2 = 0% 30% 11% 6
Whiting et al, 20152 6 (920) OR = 2.62 (1.12 to 6.13), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Numbness Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 4 (226) OR = 3.98 (1.87 to 8.49), I2 = NR RR = 3.47 (1.34 to 9.00), I2 = 0% 21% 4% 6
Impaired memory Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 2 (227) OR = 3.45 (1.19 to 9.98), I2 = NR RR = 3.41 (0.95 to 12.27), I2 = 0% 11% 2% NS (12)
Disturbance in attention or disconnected thoughts Martin-Sanchez et al, 200914 5 (381) OR = 5.12 (2.34 to 11.21), I2 = NR RR = 4.29 (1.75 to 10.53), I2 = 0% 17% 2% 7
Dizziness Mücke et al, 201619 4 (823) RD = 3% (−2% to 8%), I2 = NR NA 14% 11% NS
Wade et al, 201028 3 (666) NR RR = 2.87 (2.02 to 4.08),* NA 32% 11% 5
Whiting et al, 20152 41 (4243) OR = 5.09 (4.10 to 6.32), I2 = 18% NA NR NR NA
Nausea Whiting et al, 20152 30 (3579) OR = 2.08 (1.63 to 2.65), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Diarrhea Whiting et al, 20152 17 (2077) OR = 1.65 (1.04 to 2.62), I2 = 15% NA NR NR NA
Fatigue Whiting et al, 20152 20 (2171) OR = 2.00 (1.54 to 2.62), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Central nervous system Petzke et al, 201616 9 (1304) RD = 36% (14% to 59%), I2 = NR NA 60% 27% 4
Psychiatric Mücke et al, 201619 5 (763) RD = 1% (−2% to 4%), I2 = NR NA 4% 3% NS
Petzke et al, 201616 9 (1304) RD = 11% (6% to 16%), I2 = NR NA 17% 5% 9
Wade et al, 201028 3 (666) NR RR = 3.29 (1.98 to 5.48),* NA 19% 6% 8
Dry mouth Whiting et al, 20152 36 (4181) OR = 3.50 (2.58 to 4.75), I2 = 28% NA NR NR NA
Depression Whiting et al, 20152 15 (2353) OR = 1.32 (0.87 to 2.01), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Anxiety Whiting et al, 20152 12 (1242) OR = 1.98 (0.73 to 5.35), I2 = 54% NA NR NR NA
Vomiting Whiting et al, 20152 17 (2191) OR = 1.67 (1.13 to 2.47), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Asthenia or weakness Whiting et al, 20152 15 (1717) OR = 2.03 (1.35 to 3.06), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Dyspnea Whiting et al, 20152 4 (375) OR = 0.83 (0.26 to 2.63), I2 = 0% NA NR NR NA
Hypotension Tramèr et al, 200127 13 (982) RelR = 2.23 (1.75 to 2.83), I2 = NR NA 25% 11% 8

NA—not applicable, NNH—number needed to harm, NR—not reported, NS—not significant, OR—odds ratio, RCT—randomized controlled trial, RD—risk difference, RelR—relative risk, RR—risk ratio, RCT—randomized controlled trial.

*

Preplanned pooling of 3 studies. Combined data available, so RR was calculated without formal meta-analysis.

Confidence intervals suggest that benefit is likely, so estimated NNH provided.