Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 28;107(10):djv199. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv199

Table 2.

Association between 11 circulating markers of inflammation and lung cancer risk in the replication study, in the discovery study, and in pooled data from the two studies combined

Replication study Discovery study Pooled estimate
Marker Category Lung cancer case patients Control subjects ORs (95% CIs)* ORs (95% CIs)* ORs (95% CIs)*
CRP 1 112 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 99 156 0.94 (0.63 to 1.38) 1.58 (1.06 to 2.35) 1.21 (0.92 to 1.59)
3 121 156 1.09 (0.75 to 1.59) 1.69 (1.14 to 2.51) 1.34 (1.03 to 1.75)
4 192 156 1.77 (1.23 to 2.54) 2.27 (1.51 to 3.41) 1.99 (1.52 to 2.61)
Ptrend <.001 <.001 <.001
SAA 1 95 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 138 156 1.84 (1.27 to 2.66) 1.21 (0.83 to 1.77) 1.51 (1.16 to 1.96)
3 147 156 1.90 (1.31 to 2.75) 1.59 (1.08 to 2.33) 1.72 (1.32 to 2.25)
4 144 156 1.88 (1.28 to 2.76) 2.18 (1.48 to 3.22) 2.03 (1.55 to 2.66)
Ptrend .003 <.001 <.001
sTNFRII 1 102 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 132 156 1.29 (0.90 to 1.85) 1.27 (0.89 to 1.81) 1.29 (1.00 to 1.65)
3 130 156 1.35 (0.93 to 1.96) 1.35 (0.93 to 1.97) 1.35 (1.04 to 1.76)
4 160 156 1.70 (1.18 to 2.45) 1.50 (1.01 to 2.21) 1.62 (1.25 to 2.11)
Ptrend .006 .05 <.001
IL-1RA 1 374 462 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 79 81 1.10 (0.77 to 1.59) 0.71 (0.51 to 1.00) 0.92 (0.74 to 1.14)
3 72 82 1.09 (0.75 to 1.58)
Ptrend†/P .57 .05 .44
IL-7 1 223 258 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 89 122 0.98 (0.69 to 1.39) 1.47 (1.05 to 2.06) 1.17 (0.95 to 1.44)
3 102 123 1.00 (0.70 to 1.42)
4 111 122 1.14 (0.80 to 1.63)
Ptrend†/P .52 .02 .15
TGF-A 1 118 158 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 106 154 1.05 (0.73 to 1.52) 1.26 (0.86 to 1.84) 1.14 (0.88 to 1.48)
3 173 157 1.55 (1.09 to 2.22) 1.40 (0.96 to 2.05) 1.47 (1.14 to 1.90)
4 128 156 1.12 (0.77 to 1.63) 1.56 (1.07 to 2.27) 1.31 (1.01 to 1.71)
Ptrend .22 .02 .01
CXCL5/ENA 78 1 118 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 129 156 0.99 (0.69 to 1.41) 1.43 (1.01 to 2.03) 1.21 (0.94 to 1.54)
3 142 157 1.20 (0.83 to 1.72) 1.13 (0.79 to 1.63) 1.17 (0.91 to 1.51)
4 136 156 0.96 (0.96 to 1.43) 1.68 (1.15 to 2.45) 1.29 (0.98 to 1.68)
Ptrend .87 .03 .10
CXCL9/MIG 1 97 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 108 156 1.14 (0.78 to 1.67) 0.92 (0.63 to 1.34) 1.02 (0.79 to 1.33)
3 135 157 1.44 (0.98 to 2.11) 1.38 (0.95 to 2.00) 1.40 (1.08 to 1.83)
4 185 156 2.09 (1.41 to 3.08) 1.63 (1.12 to 2.36) 1.82 (1.40 to 2.37)
Ptrend <.001 .003 <.001
CXCL13/BCA-1 1 115 151 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 116 152 0.91 (0.63 to 1.31) 0.97 (0.67 to 1.40) 0.95 (0.73 to 1.23)
3 133 152 1.08 (0.76 to 1.53) 0.99 (0.68 to 1.45) 1.06 (0.82 to 1.37)
4 145 152 1.21 (0.85 to 1.74) 1.59 (1.10 to 2.29) 1.40 (1.08 to 1.80)
Ptrend .20 .01 .005
CCL17/TARC 1 120 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 102 156 0.73 (0.50 to 1.07) 1.16 (0.80 to 1.67) 0.93 (0.72 to 1.21)
3 113 157 0.76 (0.53 to 1.11) 1.09 (0.76 to 1.57) 0.91 (0.71 to 1.18)
4 190 156 1.26 (0.89 to 1.78) 1.50 (1.06 to 2.13) 1.38 (1.08 to 1.76)
Ptrend .13 .03 .01
CCL22/MDC 1 143 156 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 110 156 0.80 (0.56 to 1.14) 1.13 (0.78 to 1.65) 0.93 (0.72 to 1.19)
3 98 157 0.68 (0.48 to 0.97) 0.96 (0.66 to 1.41) 0.80 (0.62 to 1.04)
4 174 156 1.13 (0.79 to 1.60) 1.72 (1.18 to 2.50) 1.38 (1.07 to 1.78)
Ptrend .70 .009 .03

* Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated in conditional logistic regression models. Models were adjusted for matching criteria, personal history of bronchitis/emphysema, history of coronary heart disease or heart attack, family history of lung cancer, use of aspirin/ibuprofen, body mass index, race, and education. BCA = B-cell attracting chemokine; CI = confidence interval; CXCL9/MIG = monokine induced by gamma interferon; CRP = C-reactive protein; ENA = epithelial-derived neutrophil-activating peptide; IL = interleukin; MDC = macrophage-derived chemokine; OR = odds ratio; SAA = serum amyloid A; sTNFRII = soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-2; TARC = thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine; TGF = transforming growth factor-alpha.

† Two-sided Ptrend values across marker categories were assessed with the Wald test using marker levels as an ordinal variable with 1 degree of freedom.

‡ For IL-7 and IL-1Ra, the fraction of values above the lowest limit of quantification (LLOQ) was greater in the replication study than in the discovery study. Therefore, more categories were created for the replication study, while these markers were classified as above or below the LLOQ in the discovery study and the pooled analysis.