Skip to main content
. 2018 May 22;12:13. doi: 10.1186/s13037-018-0160-6

Table 2.

Endovascular treatment (EVT) versus surgical treatment (clipping) in the studied patients

EVT (n = 40) Surgical (n = 39) p-Value
Gender (M/F) 16/24 13/26 0.75
Age (years) 53 (21-80) 55 (23-77) 0.87
Clinical grade at admission H-H
 H-Ha 1-3 27 (67.5%) 25 (64%) 0.08
 H-Ha 4-5 13 (32.5%) 14 (36%)
Radiology At Admission
 Modified Fisher 1 + 2 (minimal SAH) 12 (30%) 8 (20.5%) 0.08
 Modified Fisher 3 + 4 (large SAH) 28 (70%) 31 (79.5%)
 Bleeding Supratentorial 6 (15%) 17 (43%)
 Bleeding Infratentorial 0 1 (2%) 0.006
 Evans index 0.28 (0.22-0.34) 0.27 (0.21-0.33) 0.45
 Ventricular Score 71.5 (58-94.7) 70.2 (66.8-73.6) 0.001
 Le Roux 0-3 0 7 (18%) 0.001
 Le Roux ≥4 40 (100%) 32 (82%)
Aneurysmal source of bleeding
 Middle cerebral artery 6 (40%) 21 (54%)
 Internal carotid artery 8 (20%) 3 (8%)
 Anterior cerebral artery 15 (37%) 11 (28%)
 Posterior circulation 11 (27%) 4 (11%) 0.001
Surgical intervention
 Shunt 8 (20%) 10 (26%) 0.004
 EVD/LD 24 (60%) 14 (36%) 0.03
 Lamina Terminalis Opening N/A 22 (56%)
 Decompressive craniotomy 0 7 (18%) 0.001
CSF Drainage
 Drainage week 1 (ml) (median, range) 1427 ± 456 1495 ± 772 0.72
 Drainage week 1-3 (ml) (median, range) 2635 ± 1020 3107 ± 1240 0.67
 Clinical Vasospasmus 27 (67%) 16 (41%) 0.023

Significant differences between groups are determined by Pearson chi-square test. Continuous data were determined using the independent sample t test

a HH Hunt and Hess grade

b EVD/LD Extraventricular drainage or lumbar drainage performed