Table 2.
Prediction of fluid responsiveness
| AUC | 95% CI | p | Threshold A | 95% CI | Threshold B | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPVPhilips | 0.92 | 0.81/1.00 | < 0.001 | 14.5 | 12.0/16.5 | 15.9 | 14.1/18.0 |
| SVVPiCCO | 0.91 | 0.79/1.00 | < 0.001 | 15.5 | 15.0/17.0 | 16.5 | 14.5/18.9 |
| PPVPiCCO | 0.88 | 0.61/0.95 | 0.001 | 16.5 | 12.0/17.5 | 16.0 | 10.7/18.3 |
| SVVFloTrac | 0.87 | 0.73/0.97 | 0.001 | 15.5 | 11.5/17.5 | 14.6 | 12.0/19.8 |
| SVVLiDCO | 0.78 | 0.61/0.96 | 0.012 | 9.5 | 9.5/20.0 | 13.5 | 9.6/20.6 |
| PPVLiDCO | 0.89 | 0.78/0.99 | < 0.001 | 14.0 | 13.0/20.5 | 16.4 | 13.2/19.7 |
| PVI | 0.68 | 0.48/0.89 | 0.097 | 15.5 | 10.5/19.5 | 17.5 | 9.3/26.2 |
AUC Area under the curve, CI Confidence interval, PPV Pulse pressure variation, PVI Pleth variability index, SVV Stroke volume variation, Threshold A Gray zone method: 2000 stratified bootstrap replicates, Threshold B Gray zone method: 10% diagnosis tolerance