Table 2.
CTFCs and Topographical Parameters Comparisons by Markis Types
| Markis IV (n = 17) |
Markis III (n = 21) |
Markis II (n = 23) |
Markis I (n = 16) |
P-valuea | Rs b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTFCindex | 28.28 ± 4.83 | 36.8 ± 10.13 | 40.04 ± 11.62 | 56.35 ± 20.95 | < 0.001 | 0.603 |
| Dindex (mm) | 5.65 ± 0.85 | 6.16 ± 0.82 | 6.75 ± 1.01 | 7.15 ± 1.77 | < 0.001 | 0.471 |
| ERindex | 1.61 ± 0.16 | 1.78 ± 0.22 | 1.94 ± 0.28 | 2.07 ± 0.48 | < 0.001 | 0.573 |
| LDindex (mm) | 28.29 ± 7.33 | 58.57 ± 11.49 | 59.35 ± 14.17 | 63.63 ± 12.78 | < 0.001 | 0.623 |
| LDtotal (mm) | 28.06 ± 7.34 | 58.57 ± 11.49 | 83.26 ± 14.45 | 131.94 ± 34.52 | < 0.001 | 0.901 |
| EEAindex (mm2) | 149.84 ± 36.68 | 361.81 ± 93.37 | 524.93 ± 126.62 | 893.99 ± 421.2 | < 0.001 | 0.653 |
| EEAtotal (mm2) | 149.84 ± 36.68 | 361.81 ± 93.37 | 397.97 ± 123.92 | 456.36 ± 190.76 | < 0.001 | 0.889 |
Abbreviations: D Diameter, ER Ectatic ratio, LD Linear dimension, EEA Estimated ectatic area
aOne-way ANOVA, bSpearman’s Rank