Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 17;108(3):djv329. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv329

Table 3.

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk of lethal prostate cancer by lifestyle score in HPFS (1990–2010) and PHS (1987–2010)*

Lifestyle scores Exposures updated over follow-up Exposures updated until date of diagnosis
Person-years of follow-up No. of lethal prostate cancer cases Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)† Person-years of follow-up No. of lethal prostate cancer cases Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) Multivariable-adjusted HR
(95% CI)†
Lifestyle score, HPFS‡
0–1 (less healthy) (Ref) 44 744 46 1 1 44 860 50 1 1
2 164 717 128 0.66 (0.46 to 0.92) 0.65 (0.46 to 0.92) 164 927 126 0.61 (0.43 to 0.84) 0.60 (0.43 to 0.84)
3 317 101 278 0.62 (0.45 to 0.85) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.85) 316 540 256 0.54 (0.39 to 0.73) 0.53 (0.39 to 0.73)
4 163 946 101 0.46 (0.32 to 0.65) 0.45 (0.31 to 0.64) 164 107 116 0.48 (0.34 to 0.68) 0.48 (0.34 to 0.68)
5–6 (more healthy) 52 493 23 0.32 (0.19 to 0.54) 0.32 (0.19 to 0.52) 52 567 28 0.37 (0.23 to 0.59) 0.37 (0.23 to 0.59)
P trend <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001
Diet score, HPFS§
0 (less healthy) (Ref) 126 403 123 1 1 126 792 126 1 1
1 449 206 346 0.72 (0.59 to 0.89) 0.74 (0.60 to 0.91) 448 956 333 0.69 (0.56 to 0.85) 0.71 (0.57 to 0.87)
2 144 098 94 0.61 (0.47 to 0.81) 0.64 (0.49 to 0.84) 144 052 103 0.66 (0.51 to 0.86) 0.69 (0.53 to 0.91)
3 (more healthy) 23 293 13 0.50 (0.28 to 0.89) 0.54 (0.30 to 0.96) 23 201 14 0.54 (0.31 to 0.94) 0.58 (0.33 to 1.01)
P trend .0002 .0007 .001 .005
Lifestyle score, PHS‡
0–1 (less healthy) (Ref) 10 362 11 1 1 10 369 11 1 1
2 57 896 48 0.71 (0.36 to 1.41) 0.76 (0.38 to 1.52) 58 191 55 0.80 (0.41 to 1.58) 0.86 (0.43 to 1.70)
3 159 279 134 0.61 (0.32 to 1.17) 0.67 (0.35 to 1.29) 159 615 134 0.61 (0.32 to 1.16) 0.66 (0.34 to 1.28)
4 121 601 104 0.53 (0.28 to 1.03) 0.57 (0.29 to 1.10) 121 238 100 0.53 (0.27 to 1.01) 0.57 (0.29 to 1.11)
5–6 (more healthy) 40 079 40 0.54 (0.27 to 1.10) 0.62 (0.30 to 1.26) 39 805 37 0.52 (0.26 to 1.06) 0.62 (0.30 to 1.27)
P trend .05 .09 .009 .03
Diet score, PHS§
0 (less healthy) (Ref) 33 741 39 1 1 33 672 31 1 1
1 192 483 150 0.66 (0.45 to 0.97) 0.71 (0.48 to 1.05) 193 033 160 0.80 (0.53 to 1.19) 0.89 (0.59 to 1.33)
2 138 906 132 0.67 (0.45 to 0.99) 0.70 (0.47 to 1.04) 138 704 125 0.75 (0.50 to 1.13) 0.83 (0.54 to 1.24)
3 (more healthy) 24 088 16 0.63 (0.36 to 1.09) 0.70 (0.40 to 1.23) 23 808 21 0.65 (0.36 to 1.17) 0.78 (0.44 to 1.41)
P trend .19 .25 .15 .30

* Cox proportional hazards regression with two-sided P values. We used a four- to six-year lag for all exposures to reduce the potential for reverse causation. Follow-up for the Health Professionals Follow-up Study began in 1990, using exposures ascertained in 1986. Follow-up for PHS started in 1987, using exposures ascertained starting in 1982. CI = confidence interval; HPFS = Health Professionals Follow-up Study; HR = hazard ratio; PHS = Physicians’ Health Study.

† Adjusted for age in months (continuous), race (white, non-white, missing), diabetes (yes, no, missing), multivitamin use (yes, no, missing), and vitamin E use (yes, no, missing). We used age as the time scale, stratified by calendar time in months (HPFS) and two-year intervals (PHS). Additionally adjusted for randomization status (aspirin, beta-carotene, both, or neither) in the PHS. The multivariable model for the diet score was additionally adjusted for body mass index, physical activity, and smoking status.

‡ Lifestyle score is determined by number of healthy lifestyle factors: 0 (least healthy) - 6 (more healthy).

§ Diet score is determined by number of healthy diet factors: 0 (least healthy) - 3 (more healthy).