Skip to main content
. 2018 May 17;62:10.29219/fnr.v62.1276. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1276

Table 5.

Nutrition education, farm production diversity, and commercialization on household, women, and child dietary diversity

HDDS WDDS CDDS



IRR IRR IRR
Nutrition information 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 0.98 (0.94–1.03) 1.03 (0.89–1.20)
Child feeding and care 1.03** (1.00–1.06) 1.09*** (1.04–1.14) 1.24** (1.04–1.50)
Farm production diversity 1.03*** (1.03–1.04) 1.04*** (1.03–1.05) 1.01 (0.98–1.05)
Market participation 1.06*** (1.04–1.09) 1.13*** (1.09–1.16) 1.15*** (1.04–1.28)
Age 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 1.00** (1.00–1.00) 1.00** (1.00–1.01)
Gender 0.99 (0.95–1.02) 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 0.96 (0.83–1.12)
Marital 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 1.00 (0.94–1.07) 1.11 (0.92–1.33)
Education 1.06*** (1.03–1.08) 1.07*** (1.03–1.11) 1.14** (1.01–1.28)
Household size 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.99** (0.98–1.00) 0.99 (0.97–1.02)
Orphans 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.01* (0.99–1.03) 1.04 (0.98–1.10)
Chronically ill 0.99 (0.96–1.01) 1.00 (0.96–1.04) 0.93 (0.77–1.14)
Land size 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 1.01*** (1.00–1.02) 0.98 (0.96–1.01)
Total income 1.00*** (1.00–1.00) 1.00*** (1.00–1.00) 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Gender of child (male) 1.03 (0.93–1.14)
District dummies Yes Yes Yes
Constant 5.27*** (4.92–5.65) 2.80*** (2.51–3.12) 3.32*** (2.32–4.75)
No. of observations 2,801 2,272 499

HDDS, household dietary diversity score; WDDS, women dietary diversity score; CDDS, child dietary diversity score; IRR, incidence rate ratios; CI, confidence interval.

The dependent variables are household, women, and CDDS. Models were estimated with negative binomial estimator. IRRs are shown with 95% CI in parentheses.

*, **, and ***

Statistically significant at the 10, 5, and 1% level, respectively.