Table 9.

Robustness checks: nutrition education, crop and livestock diversity, and commercialization on household and women dietary diversity

	Panel A: Head characteristics (age, sex, marital, and education) excluded			Panel B: Wealth (land, income) excluded
	HDDS	WDDS	CDDS	HDDS	WDDS	CDDS
	IRR	IRR	IRR	IRR	IRR	IRR
Nutrition information	1.00 (0.97–1.03)	0.98 (0.94–1.03)	1.03 (0.89–1.20)	1.00 (0.97–1.03)	0.98 (0.94–1.03)	1.02 (0.88–1.18)
Child feeding and care	1.03** (1.00–1.06)	1.09*** (1.04–1.14)	1.24** (1.04–1.48)	1.03** (1.00–1.07)	1.09*** (1.04–1.14)	1.26** (1.06–1.50)
Crop diversity	1.04*** (1.03–1.05)	1.05*** (1.04–1.07)	0.99 (0.94–1.04)	1.04*** (1.03–1.05)	1.06*** (1.04–1.07)	0.98 (0.93–1.03)
Livestock diversity	1.03*** (1.02–1.04)	1.04*** (1.02–1.05)	1.04* (1.00–1.09)	1.03*** (1.02–1.04)	1.04*** (1.02–1.05)	1.05** (1.00–1.09)
Market participation	1.06*** (1.04–1.09)	1.13*** (1.09–1.16)	1.16*** (1.05–1.30)	1.07*** (1.05–1.09)	1.14*** (1.10–1.17)	1.18*** (1.06–1.31)
Constant	5.59*** (5.32–5.87)	3.10*** (2.86–3.36)	4.48*** (3.29–6.09)	5.24 (4.89–5.62)	2.75*** (2.47–3.08)	3.26*** (2.23–4.76)
Observations	2,801	2,272	499	2,814	2,282	501

HDDS, household dietary diversity score; WDDS, women dietary diversity score; CDDS, child dietary diversity score; IRR, incidence rate ratios; CI, confidence interval.

The dependent variables are household, women, and CDDS. Models were estimated with negative binomial estimator. IRRs are shown with 95% CI in parentheses.

^{*, **, and ***}Statistically significant at the 10, 5, and 1% level, respectively. Model estimated with same covariates as in Table 6.