Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;3:2059513117695312. doi: 10.1177/2059513117695312

Table 6.

A synopsis of dermal filler studies.

Authors Publication year Patient no. Level of evidence Indication Dermal filler Cosmetic outcome Adverse effects
Beer et al. 2007 16 2.d Acne or varicella rolling and ice pick scars Poly-L-lactic acid 46.4% cumulative reduction in scar severity None identified
Sage et al. 2011 10 2.c Various morphologic acne scar types Collagen 3.05 mean improvement (3 = minimal, 4 = moderate improvement) Pain, erythema, swelling, discolouration, bruising and lumpiness
Karnik et al. 2014 147 1.c Rolling acne scars PPMA 84% of scars improved (based on the Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score) Pain, tenderness and swelling
Sapra et al. 2015 22 2.d Rolling acne scars Poly-L-lactic acid 63.6% of patients achieved a much to excellent improvement (score of ≤2 using a 4-point scale) Nodule formation, eczema and hyperpigmentation
Goodman et al. 2016 5 2.d Various morphologic acne scar types Hyaluronic acid Pre Tx mean score: 3.2; post Tx mean score: 2.6 (based on the quantitative global scarring grading system) N/A