Table 2.
TIPS results
| Outcome | TIPS creation technique | p-value | |
| Conventional (n = 18) | Primary Constrained (n = 9) | ||
| Pre-TIPS PSG (mmHg) | 17.7, ±8.2 | 14, ±3 | 0.758 |
| Post-TIPS PSG (mmHg) | 6.7, ±1.84 | 7.9, ±1.96 | 0.693 |
| PSG reduction (mmHg) | 10.6, ±8.879 | 6.1, ±2.57 | 0.731 |
| Post-procedural MELD Score | 16, ±5.8 | 14, ±6.4 | 0.742 |
| Improvement of recurrent ascitesa | n = 7, 100% improvement | n = 7, 87.5% improvementb | 1.0 |
| Improvement of variceal haemorrhagea | n = 11, 100% resolution | n = 1, 100% resolution | 1.0 |
MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; PSG, portosystemic gradient; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
aImprovement and resolution of clinical symptoms that were indication for TIPS placement in each group.
bBased on data from total of eight patients who underwent primary constrained TIPS placement for indication of refractory ascites.