Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;91(1083):20170409. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170409

Table 2.

TIPS results

Outcome TIPS creation technique p-value
Conventional (n = 18) Primary Constrained (n = 9)
Pre-TIPS PSG (mmHg) 17.7, ±8.2 14, ±3 0.758
Post-TIPS PSG (mmHg) 6.7, ±1.84 7.9, ±1.96 0.693
PSG reduction (mmHg) 10.6, ±8.879 6.1, ±2.57 0.731
Post-procedural MELD Score 16, ±5.8 14, ±6.4 0.742
Improvement of recurrent ascitesa n = 7, 100% improvement n = 7, 87.5% improvementb 1.0
Improvement of variceal haemorrhagea n = 11, 100% resolution n = 1, 100% resolution 1.0

MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; PSG, portosystemic gradient; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

aImprovement and resolution of clinical symptoms that were indication for TIPS placement in each group.

bBased on data from total of eight patients who underwent primary constrained TIPS placement for indication of refractory ascites.