Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 5;91(1083):20170393. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170393

Table 4.

Comparison of our study data with literature published indices

Dosimetric index Definition Our study(n = 91) Kannarunimit et al21 (n = 9) Rausche- bach et al22 (n = 25) Weyh et al23 (n = 8) Ding et al24 (n = 8) Rana et al25 (n = 14) Dickey et al26(n = 23)
PTV, cm3 Range 5.1–252.5 36.2 ± 18.1 12.65–190.7 7.63–83.43 14.6–145.4 3.2–43.0 16.0–67.0
Coverage Coverage, % 96.7 ± 1.92 96.0 ± 1.0
Homogeneity HIRTOG 1.27 ± 0.07 1.19 ± 0.02
Conformity indices CIRTOG 1.03 ± 0.07 1.11 ± 0.05 0.99 ± 0.02 1.29 ± 0.02 1.64 ± 0.29 1.18 ± 0.09 1.03 ± 0.03
CN 0.90 ± 0.06 0.84 ± 0.03 0.88 ± 0.02
Gradient R50% (RTOG) 4.40 ± 0.70 4.52 ± 0.46 3.57 ± 0.32 6.53 ± 1.2 4.90 ± 0.56 4.76 ± 0.36
Low dose spillage (%) D2 cm (%) 54.90 ± 10.7 28.52 ± 2.2 52.0 ± 6.0 67.34 ± 0.02 50.09 ± 6.26 54.0 ± 3.4
High dose spillage (%) (V105%PD–PTV)/PTV 0.90 ± 1.70 0.68 ± 0.01
Total lung dose (%) V20 Gy 4.80 ± 3.20 4.66 ± 1.26 3.77 ± 2.9 6.32 ± 3.9 5.3 ± 3.6 5.96 ± 2.77
V5 Gy 16.40 ± 9.20 23.20 ± 7.21

CI, conformity index; CN, confirmation number; HI, homogeneity index; PTV, planning target volume; RTOG, radiation therapy oncology group.