Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 7;77(1):104–118. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637104

Table 2.

Type I Error Rates for Dichotomous Data.

Iterative Wald approach
Wald-2 approach
Scale length
15 items
30 items
15 items
30 items
NR/NF 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500
Compensatory DIF
 % DIF = 0.2
  DIF size = 0.3 .04 .04 .08 .07 .05 .05 .09 .08 .06 .05 .10 .08 .06 .06 .11 .09
  DIF size = 0.5 .05 .05 .08 .07 .05 .05 .08 .07 .07 .07 .12 .10 .06 .07 .11 .09
  DIF size = 0.7 .05 .04 .07 .07 .05 .05 .08 .07 .08 .07 .15 .13 .07 .07 .13 .11
 % DIF = 0.4
  DIF size = 0.3 .05 .05 .07 .07 .05 .05 .08 .08 .07 .06 .10 .09 .06 .06 .14 .12
  DIF size = 0.5 .05 .06 .07 .07 .05 .06 .05 .05 .09 .08 .15 .13 .08 .07 .10 .08
  DIF size = 0.7 .05 .05 .08 .06 .04 .06 .07 .08 .12 .10 .24 .17 .09 .07 .18 .15
Noncompensatory DIF
 % DIF = 0.2
  DIF size = 0.3 .02 .02 .02 .03 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .06 .05 .03 .03 .03 .04
  DIF size = 0.5 .02 .03 .02 .03 .02 .02 .02 .02 .07 .05 .17 .11 .05 .04 .09 .08
  DIF size = 0.7 .02 .03 .02 .03 .02 .02 .02 .02 .15 .10 .33 .23 .10 .07 .21 .17
 % DIF = 0.4
  DIF size = 0.3 .05 .05 .08 .09 .04 .05 .07 .07 .07 .06 .18 .13 .05 .06 .11 .10
  DIF size = 0.5 .11 .11 .19 .17 .10 .10 .16 .14 .23 .17 .55 .40 .19 .15 .38 .32
  DIF size = 0.7 .21 .21 .24 .27 .19 .15 .28 .21 .51 .34 .76 .66 .41 .30 .71 .59

Note. DIF = differential Item Functioning; NR = number of respondents in reference group; NF = number of respondents in focal group; % DIF = percentage of DIF items.