Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 7;77(1):104–118. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637104

Table 4.

Power for Dichotomous Data.

Iterative Wald approach
Wald-2 approach
Scale length
15 items
30 items
15 items
30 items
NR/NF 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500 500/500 750/250 1,000/1,000 1,500/500
Compensatory DIF
 % DIF = 0.2
  DIF size = 0.3 .31 .25 .54 .45 .35 .29 .62 .52 .34 .27 .57 .47 .38 .30 .64 .54
  DIF size = 0.5 .64 .54 .81 .78 .67 .58 .86 .80 .67 .57 .82 .80 .69 .60 .87 .82
  DIF size = 0.7 .81 .74 .91 .88 .85 .78 .94 .91 .83 .76 .92 .89 .86 .79 .95 .91
 % DIF = 0.4
  DIF size = 0.3 .31 .24 .49 .46 .33 .27 .84 .78 .36 .28 .55 .49 .37 .29 .86 .80
  DIF size = 0.5 .59 .51 .78 .73 .66 .57 .82 .77 .65 .55 .81 .76 .70 .60 .84 .78
  DIF size = 0.7 .75 .68 .89 .85 .83 .57 .93 .90 .80 .73 .91 .88 .84 .60 .94 .91
Noncompensatory DIF
 % DIF = 0.2
  DIF size = 0.3 .37 .23 .68 .58 .32 .22 .57 .46 .40 .24 .71 .59 .34 .23 .59 .49
  DIF size = 0.5 .72 .57 .90 .87 .68 .59 .87 .81 .76 .60 .93 .88 .70 .61 .88 .83
  DIF size = 0.7 .86 .72 .96 .92 .84 .74 .95 .92 .89 .75 .98 .93 .86 .77 .96 .93
 % DIF = 0.4
  DIF size = 0.3 .22 .15 .49 .37 .22 .15 .41 .32 .24 .16 .53 .39 .23 .16 .43 .34
  DIF size = 0.5 .49 .35 .73 .66 .49 .39 .70 .63 .53 .38 .81 .71 .52 .41 .72 .67
  DIF size = 0.7 .64 .47 .80 .74 .64 .57 .82 .78 .72 .54 .90 .83 .68 .60 .87 .83

Note. DIF = differential item functioning; NR = number of respondents in reference group; NF = number of respondents in focal group; %DIF = percentage of DIF items.