Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;76(6):933–953. doi: 10.1177/0013164416633735

Table 5.

Relative Fit of One-Class Versus Two-Class Conditional Models (of 500 Samples, N = 200).

Fit statistic Mean differencea Mean % changea Class membershipb
One covariate, skewness 0, kurtosis 0
 AIC 39.84 0.85 Class 1 = 68 (34)
 BIC 26.64 0.56 Class 2 = 132 (66)
 SBIC 39.32 0.83
One covariate, skewness 0, kurtosis 2
 AIC 35.62 0.76 Class 1 = 68 (34.00)
 BIC 22.42 0.17 Class 2 = 132 (65.00)
 SBIC 35.10 0.23
One covariate, skewness 1.6, kurtosis 0
 AIC 51.81 1.10 Class 1 = 116 (58.18)
 BIC 38.61 0.82 Class 2 = 84 (41.82)
 SBIC 51.28 1.09
Two covariates, skewness 0, kurtosis 0
 AIC 56.39 1.06 Class 1 = 82 (40.84)
 BIC 39.90 0.74 Class 2 = 118 (59.16)
 SBIC 55.74 1.05
Two covariates, skewness 0, kurtosis 2
 AIC 45.50 0.86 Class 1 = 83 (41.35)
 BIC 29.01 0.55 Class 2 = 117 (58.65)
 SBIC 44.85 0.85
Two covariates, skewness 1.6, kurtosis 0
 AIC 52.16 0.99 Class 1 = 115 (57.44)
 BIC 35.66 0.67 Class 2 = 85 (42.56)
 SBIC 51.51 0.98

Note. AIC = Akaike’s information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; SBIC = sample-corrected BIC.

a

Mean difference = Fit1 − Fit2, and percentage change = (1 − Fit2/Fit1) × 100.