Table 5.
Correlation in discrimination parameter |
Correlation in difficulty parameter |
Correlation in factor scores |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2PL data vs. congeneric fit | Minimum | Median | Maximum | Minimum | Median | Maximum | Minimum | Median | Maximum |
Case 1 | 0.656 | 0.909 | 0.983 | 0.991 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 1.000 |
Case 2 | 0.877 | 0.952 | 0.986 | 0.992 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 1.000 |
Case 3 | 0.505 | 0.913 | 0.974 | 0.992 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 1.000 |
Case 4 | 0.887 | 0.945 | 0.973 | 0.995 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Case 5 | 0.696 | 0.914 | 0.963 | 0.994 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 1.000 |
Case 6 | 0.887 | 0.948 | 0.977 | 0.995 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Note. 2PL IRT = two-parameter logistic item response theory.