Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;91(1082):20170426. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170426

Table 2.

Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of included studies

First author Year of publication STARD evaluation % (n/34) PET CT (Yes/No) PET scanner Methionine dose (range or mean MBq/mCi) Semi-quantitative analysis Tumour ROI Contralateral ROI region
Berntsson 2013 47 (16/34) Yes ECAT EXACT HR +/Discovery ST NA Uptake ratio (NOS) Max tumour GM
Boss 2010 53 (18/34) Yes Biograph 16 585–764 Uptake ratio (NOS) Mean tumour Frontal GM
Coope 2007 56 (19/34) Yes ECAT EXACT HR + 740 Uptake ratio (NOS) Max tumour Mirror region
Gumprecht 2007 41 (14/34) Yes ECAT HR 300–400 Uptake ratio (NOS) Mean tumour GM
Kameyama 1990 29 (10/34) Yes ECAT II/PT-931 222–925/6–25 SUV SUV tumour SUV GM
Miyake 2012 44 (15/34) Yes ECAT EXACT HR + 113–389 SUV SUV max tumour SUV mean in normal brain (NOS)
Ogawa 1993 32 (11/34) No (CT and PET) Headtome III/Headtome IV 555–1,480/15–40 SUV SUV tumour SUV temporal GM
Okita 2014 50 (17/34) Yes Eminence Sophia SET-3000 GCT/X 111–222/3–6 SUV SUV max tumour SUV mean frontal GM
Sadeghi 2006 44 (15/34) Yes ECAT 962 h + 260 Uptake ratio (NOS) Max tumour Corona radiata
Tateishi 2014 62 (21/34) Yes Biograph 16 370 SUV SUV max tumour SUV GM
Tietze 2015 44 (15/34) Yes Biograph PET/CT system 500 Uptake ratio (NOS) Max tumour GM
Torii 2005 44 (15/34) No (MRI and PET) Headtome IV 7.4/0.2 per kg Uptake ratio (NOS) Max tumour Frontal GM
Yamamoto 2008 56 (19/34) Yes ECAT EXACT HR + 6 per kg SUV SUV tumour SUV mean GM

GM, grey matter; NA, not available; NOS, not otherwise specified; PET, positron emission tomography; ROI, region of interest; STARD, standards for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy (% adherence to 34 quality items); SUV, standardized uptake value.