Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;91(1082):20170529. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170529

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and ultrasound findings

All (n = 62) Appendicitis (n = 27, 44%) Non-appendicitis (n = 35, 56%) p-value
Age (years) 28.5 ± 19.9 30.9 ± 19.3 26.6 ± 20.4 0.4
Sex 0.59
 F 30 (48%) 12 (44%) 18 (51%)
 M 32 (52%) 15 (56%) 17 (49%)
BMI 21.5 ± 3.3 22.9 ± 2.7 20.4 ± 3.4 0.005
Appendix visualization on ultrasound 0.5
 No 2 (3%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%)
 Yes 59 (95%) 27 (100%) 32 (91%)
 Partial 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%)
Appendix maximal diameter (mm) 6.1 ± 2.2 6.5 ± 2.6 5.8 ± 1.8 0.24
Appendix wall thickness (mm) 1.6 ± 0.9 2.0 ± 1.1 1.3 ± 0.7 0.01
Appendix luminal diameter (mm) 3.3 ± 1.9 3.8 ± 2.2 3.0 ± 1.5 0.09
Increased wall flow in appendix 0.001
 No 42 (70%) 12 (44%) 30 (91%)
 Yes 18 (30%) 15 (56%) 3 (9%)
Appendix mucosal discontinuity 0.001
 No 48 (80%) 16 (59%) 32 (97%)
 Yes 7 (12%) 7 (26%) 0 (0%)
 Indeterminate 5 (8%) 4 (15%) 1 (3%)
Non-compressibility of appendix 0.001
 No 19 (32%) 1 (4%) 18 (55%)
 Yes 36 (60%) 23 (85%) 13 (39%)
 Indeterminate 5 (8%) 3 (11%) 2 (6%)
Probe tenderness over the appendix 0.001
 No 28 (47%) 1 (4%) 27 (82%)
 Yes 21 (35%) 20 (74%) 1 (3%)
 Indeterminate 11 (18%) 6 (22%) 5 (15%)
Periappendiceal increased echo 0.039
 No 53 (88%) 21 (78%) 32 (97%)
 Yes 7 (12%) 6 (22%) 1 (3%)
Interval CT to ultrasound (min) 1232 ± 2607 1025 ± 3044 1392 ± 2246 0.59

BMI, body mass index; F, female; M, male.