Table 3.
Ultrasound findings to discriminate appendicitis from non-appendicitis in backward elimination logistic regression analysis
| Variables | Frequency (60)a | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendix wall thickness (2 mm)b | 45 | Reference | |||
| 15 | |||||
| Increased wall flow in appendix | 18.0 | 3.09, 104.6 | 0.001 | ||
| No | 42 | Reference | |||
| Yes | 18 | ||||
| Appendix mucosal discontinuity | |||||
| No | 53 | Reference | |||
| Yes | 7 | ||||
| Non-compressibility of appendix | 12.7 | 2.45, 66.23 | 0.002 | ||
| No | 24 | ||||
| Yes | 36 | ||||
| Probe tenderness over the appendix | |||||
| No | 39 | Reference | |||
| Yes | 21 | ||||
| Periappendiceal increased echo | |||||
| No | 53 | Reference | |||
| Yes | 7 | ||||
The number in parentheses is the total number of cases used in this analysis. Two cases among the enrolled patients were excluded owing to the non-visualization of appendix in ultrasound re-evaluation.
The optimal cut-off value for discrimination of appendicitis was obtained by the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index.