Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195962

Table 3. Sensitivity analyses—Multivariable hazard ratios for type 2 diabetes risk by food security status (2004–2016).

Food Security Status Model 1* p-value Model 2 p-value Model 3 p-value Model 4§ p-value
Hazard Ratio 95% CI Hazard Ratio 95% CI Hazard Ratio 95% CI Hazard Ratio 95% CI
1 Year Wash Out Period (n = 4,682)
Secure 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
Insecure 2.32 1.09, 4.95 0.0296 2.40 1.13, 5.09 0.0231 2.38 1.12, 5.05 0.0238 2.06 0.94, 4.46 0.0694
2 Year Wash Out Period (n = 4,617)
Secure 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
Insecure 2.43 1.06, 5.57 0.0360 2.42 1.06, 5.53 0.0358 2.36 1.03, 5.41 0.0437 2.03 0.86, 4.78 0.1075
Including underweight individuals (n = 4,851)
Secure 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
Insecure 2.30 1.13, 4.70 0.0222 2.47 1.21, 5.06 0.0132 2.40 1.16, 4.94 0.0179 2.07 0.98, 4.34 0.0551

* Model 1 adjusted for age, gender

Model 2 adjusted for age, gender, income, race

Model 3 adjusted for age, gender, income, race, physical activity, smoking, alcohol, diet quality

§ Model 4 adjusted for age, gender, income, race, physical activity, smoking, alcohol, diet quality, BMI