Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0197752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197752

Table 3. Comparison of phoma stem canker severity and seed yield between different oilseed rape cultivars grown in winter oilseed rape field experiments at 13 sites over three growing seasons (2010/2011, 2011/2012, 2012/2013).

Cultivara Phoma stem canker Seed yield
Severityb Relative severity
(%)c
Yield (t/ha) Relative yield (%)c
Adriana (Rlm4 + QR) 1.42ded 68.5de 4.28bc 106.20c
Bilbao (Rlm4) 2.13bc 118bc 4.40ab 109.19bc
Capitol (Rlm1) 2.42b 136.7b 3.52d 87.30e
DK Cabernet (Rlm1 + QR) 1.39de 69.6de 4.56ab 114.17ab
Drakkar (no R, no QR) 4.26a 277.4a 1.96e 48.20f
Es-Astrid (QR) 1.09ef 51.4ef 4.49ab 111.96bc
Excel (Rlm7 + QR) 0.85f 36.2f 4.79a 118.87a
NK Grandia (QR) 1.73cd 96.3c 4.39ab 109.07bc
Roxet (Rlm7) 0.95ef 45.8ef 3.84cd 95.04d
SEDe 0.27 12.95 0.22 3.28

a Oilseed rape cultivars with or without an Rlm gene against Leptosphaeria maculans in a background with or without quantitative resistance (QR) were used in field experiments.

bThe severity of phoma stem canker was assessed in summer before harvest on a 0−6 scale modified from that of Lô-Pelzer et al. (2009).

cThe relative cultivar stem canker severity or seed yield was calculated as a percentage, based on the relationships between stem canker severity score or seed yield for individual cultivars and the mean stem canker severity score or yield for all cultivars at a given site.

dDifferent letters indicate a significant difference at P ≤0.05.

eSED is the standard error of the difference used to calculate the least significance difference (LSD) at significance level P ≤0.05 when multiple comparisons were done.