Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 28;46(8):20160475. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160475

Table A3.

Risk of bias in individual studies. Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria fulfilled.

  Item Koh and Kim14 2011 Barngkgei et al15 2014 Barngkgei et al16 2016 Barngkgei et al17 2015 Güngör et al18 2016 Mostafa et al19 2016
Domain 1: patient selection Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Was a case–control design avoided? N N N N N N
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? H H H H H H
Concerns regarding applicability: Is there concern that the included patients do not match the review question? L L L L L L
Domain 2: index test Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? U U U U U U
If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? U U U U U U
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? U U U U U U
Concerns regarding applicability: Is there concern that the index test, its conduct or interpretation differ from the review question? L L L L L L
Domain 3: reference standard Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Could the reference standard, its conduct or its interpretation have introduced bias? L L L L L L
Concerns regarding applicability: Is there concern that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the review question? L L L L L L
Domain 4: flow and timing Was there an appropriate interval between index test(s) and reference standard? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Did all patients receive a reference standard? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Did patients receive the same reference standard? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Were all patients included in the analysis? Y Y Y Y Y Y
Could the patient flow have introduced bias? L L L L L L

H, high risk; L, low risk; N, no; U, unclear; Y, yes.