Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;91(1084):20170717. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170717

Table 4.

Analysis of the effects of contrast agent and technique used (manual vs semi-automated) in quantification of aortic flow and PWV

Technique of analysis Pre-contrast Post-contrast p (<0.05)
Manual
  Aortic flow (ml) 62.3 ± 12.8 60.7 ± 12.3 0.06
  Arch PWV (ms−1) 7.9 ± 2.0 8.2 ± 2.6 0.61
  Aortic PWV (ms−1) 8.1 ± 2.1 8.9 ± 4.2 0.20
Semi-automated
  Aortic flow (ml) 59.6 ± 12.1a 58.2 ± 11.8a 0.14
  Arch PWV (ms−1) 7.3 ± 1.8a 7.7 ± 2.2 0.21
  Aortic PWV (ms−1) 7.5 ± 1.9a 7.7 ± 1.8a 0.45

aDenotes semi-automatic quantified parameters which were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) in comparison with manual analysis. PWV, pulse wave velocity.