Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;91(1084):20170774. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170774

Table 1.

Summary of evidence-based suggestions for further evaluation of incidental FDG uptake in the head and necka

Site of focal uptake Evidence/when to further evaluate Recommended form of evaluation
Pituitary gland Foci with SUVmax > 4.17 Pituitary MRI and/or hormonal testing
Piriform fossa Foci with SUVmax ≥ 4.28 Referral to ENT for direct visualization
Foci with SUVmaxI : SUVmaxC ≥ 1.8
Palatine tonsils Foci with SUVmax ratio between tonsils > 1.59, 10
Nasopharynx Foci with SUVmax > 6.011
Oro and nasopharynx not specified above Inadequate evidence for foci not meeting the above criteria.
Parotid: patients without cancer Consider referring all foci, as common benign causes usually require further evaluation and some incidental malignancies occur. Ultrasound, MRI or referral to ENT
Parotid: patients with head and neck malignancy Focus is much more likely to be either a metastasis from the known cancer or benign.14 Further evaluation may well be unnecessary
Thyroid All foci Ultrasound ± FNA

aLimitations in SUV reproducibility and individual patient characteristics, particularly other life-limiting comorbidities and patient choice, should be taken into account when using this evidence.

ENT, ear, nose and throat; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; SUV, standardized uptake value.