Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;8:8043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26239-1

Table 1.

AUC values and DRS for different pathogens. Figures in round brackets show the CI 95% (2,000 bootstrap replicates).

n AUC Sensitivity Specificity DRS P -value
All patients
Rotavirus 53
EAEC 18 68.7 (54.0-83.3) 69.8 (56.6–81.1) 66.7 (44.4–88.9) −6.76 2.160 × 10–2
EPEC 10 78.6 (66.1–90.9) 60.4 (47.2–73.6) 90.0 (70.0–100.0) −7.74 8.879 × 10−3
DAEC 21 73.6 (61.7–85.5) 67.9 (54.7–81.1) 76.2 (57.1–90.5) −7.21 2.494 × 10−3*
Salmonella 36 80.8 (71.9–89.6) 67.9 (54.7–79.2) 83.3 (69.4–94.4) −7.41 6.927 × 10−7*
Shigella 36 89.0 (82.5–95.6) 69.8 (56.6–83.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) −6.88 3.140 × 10−12*
All Bacteria 121 80.0 (72.6–87.4) 67.9 (54.7–79.2) 84.3 (77.7–90.1) −7.41 6.944 × 10−11*
Severe & Moderate
Rotavirus 19
EAEC 6 58.8 (28.4–89.2) 79.0 (57.9–94.7) 33.3 (0.0–66.7) −6.25 6.102 × 10−1
EPEC 3 84.2 (52.3–100.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 66.7 (0.0–100.0) −4.37 1.780 × 10−1
DAEC 6 86.0 (66.6–100.0) 89.5 (73.7–100.0) 66.7 (33.3–100.0) −5.80 4.057 × 10−2
Salmonella 12 83.3 (69.0–97.6) 68.4 (47.4–89.5) 83.3 (58.3–100.0) −7.41 5.879 × 10−3*
Shigella 22 93.5 (86.6–100.0) 73.7 (52.6–94.7) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) −6.75 2.219 × 10−7*
All bacteria 49 85.3 (75.7–94.9) 79.0 (57.9–94.7) 77.6 (65.3–87.8) −6.40 2.126 × 10−6*
Mild
Rotavirus 34
EAEC 12 73.5 (57.6–89.5) 67.7 (47.1–82.4) 75.0 (0.5–100.0) −6.76 1.818 × 10−2
EPEC 7 74.8 (59.3–90.3) 67.7 (47.1–82.4) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) −7.57 4.668 × 10−2
DAEC 15 69.0 (53.9–84.2) 64.7 (47.1–79.4) 80.0 (60.0–100.0) −7.78 3.601 × 10−2
Salmonella 24 80.0 (68.6–91.4) 67.7 (53.0–82.4) 66.7 (83.3–95.8) −7.55 4.698 × 10−5*
Shigella 14 84.2 (73.4–95.1) 67.7 (52.9–82.4) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) −6.88 1.157 × 10−5*
All bacteria 72 77.0 (66.5–87.4) 67.7 (50.0–82.4) 86.1 (77.8–93.1) −7.57 8.154 × 10−6*

P-values evaluate the significance of the difference between bacterial pathogen vs. viral infection under a t-test; an asterisk. (*) indicates those values surpassing a Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Note that the reference viral pathogen in our study is rotavirus (for which there is only very little information available in the literature; e.g.43).