Table 3.
Diagnostic performance of TID in meta-analyzed studies
| Study | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xu et al28 | 56 | 90 | 56 | 90 |
| Kinoshita et al29 | 91.4 | 76.9 | 79 | 90 |
| Petretta et al30 | 27.5 | 92.9 | 59.3 | 76 |
| Weis et al1 | 60 | 95 | 85 | 82 |
| Chouraqui et al6 | 62.5 | 85 | – | – |
| Emmett et al31 | 30.4 | 87.5 | 63.6 | 63.6 |
| Fallahi et al18 | 66.7 | 70.8 | – | – |
| Emmett et al32 | 30 | 93 | 79 | 63 |
| Marcassa et al5 | 37 | 61 | 64 | 34 |
| Rischpler et al27 | 21 | 95.8 | 77 | 63 |
| Mazzanti et al33 | 77 | 92 | – | – |
| Abidov et al34 | 73 | 88 | – | – |
| Golzar et al12 | 7 | 98 | – | – |