Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;15:71–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2018.02.007

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with port use complications.

Case Disorder Age (years) Sex (M/F) Time with TIVAD Complication Removal of TIVAD? (Y/N/reinserted) Resolution
1 Alpha mannosidosis 18 M 3 years Skin thinning and discoloration; small bruise over TIVAD site N Change from lidocaine/prilocaine cream to ethyl chloride spray
2 MPS II 19 M 2 years, 8 months Skin atrophy; bruise around TIVAD site; small scab over port Reinserted Change from lidocaine/prilocaine cream to ethyl chloride spray
3 MPS VI 20 M 8 months Skin burn from overuse of tetracaine cream Reinserted Change from tetracaine to lidocaine/prilocaine cream
4 MPS I N/A N/A 2 years Infective endocarditis Y Valve replacement
5 MPS II 28 M 8 years Thrombus Y Warfarin treatment; after port removal, used peripheral infusions
6 MPS II 29 M 3 years Port failure; subsequent difficulties placing pacemaker Y Successful placement of pacemaker after third complex procedure
7 MPS I 26 F 2 years; 6 months; 5 years; ongoing Multiple port failures (fourth port in use); collateral vessel interference with angiography N Continue with fourth TIVAD; however, distorted vasculature noted
8 MPS VI 27 at time of death F 1 year; 6 years Fatal, generalized infection; port was considered infection entry route

MPS, mucopolysaccharidosis; N/A, not available; TIVAD, totally implantable vascular access device.