Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 12;314(4):E396–E405. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00261.2017

Table 1.

Subjects’ characteristics

AL CR P
N (men, women) 19 (7, 12) 34 (10, 24)
Age, yr 38.7 ± 1.2 40.0 ± 1.2 0.47
Weight, kg 71.0 ± 1.9 71.9 ± 1.5 0.73
Body mass index, kg/m2 25.5 ± 0.4 25.7 ± 0.3 0.70
Normal weight, n 9 14
Overweight, n 10 20
Fat-free mass, kg 48.3 ± 1.9 47.8 ± 1.5 0.86
Fat mass, kg 23.4 ± 0.9 24.7 ± 0.9 0.36
Body fat, % 32.9 ± 1.3 34.2 ± 1.1 0.47
Abdominal subcutaneous AT, kg 5.0 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.3 0.26
Abdominal visceral AT, kg 0.7 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.1 0.29
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 112 ± 2 115 ± 2 0.95
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 73 ± 2 76 ± 1 0.83
Glucose, mg/dl 83 ± 1 82 ± 1 0.36
Insulin, mU/ml 6.5 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 0.4 0.06
HOMA-IR, AU 1.33 ± 0.11 1.05 ± 0.09 0.06

Data are presented as LSM ± SE. AT, adipose tissue; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance. P value indicates statistical significance of difference between the calorie restriction (CR) and ad libitum diet (AL) groups.