Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Physiol. 2017 Feb 10;79:335–356. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034202

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of Hh signaling suppression or inhibition on FGP morphology and Hh-responding cells. FGP diagrams illustrate Gli1lacZ+, Hh-responding cells (insets), for (a) control mouse tongue and (b) after Hh signaling suppression or inhibition. An H&E stained FGP image is included as an inset in a, the control diagram. This provides a comparison for images in cf. (cf) Four examples of papilla morphology after Hh signaling repression with taste bud cell loss are presented in H&E staining. Examples represent four different models for Hh/Gli suppression, or Smo inhibition or Smo deletion: (c) epithelial expression of a dominant negative-repressor form of Gli2C4); (d) genetic conditional deletion of Gli2 from epithelium; (e) pharmacological blockade of Smo with the Hh pathway inhibitor LDE225; and (f) global conditional deletion of Smo. After Hh signaling suppression in all models, Hh-responding cells are eliminated in the epithelium but retained in papilla stroma (as shown in the inset in panel b from the Gli1lacz Hh signaling reporter mouse). With Hh signaling disruption, the FGP loses an intact apical taste bud, and across models, the papilla acquires a pointed, heavily keratinized spinous apex. Abbreviations: FGP, fungiform papillae; Hh, Hedgehog; Shh, Sonic Hedgehog; Smo, smoothened receptor.