Skip to main content
. 2018 May 24;20:33. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0454-y

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of maximum sector values between ECV/18F-FDG (a), native T1/18F-FDG (b) and ECV/native T1 (c) for all 25 patients, showing no significant correlations between the three methods. All points in plots (a-c) are equivalent to a per-patient average of the two highest sector values shown in the corresponding pooled comparisons in Fig. 2 (a-c)