Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;13(3):422–428. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09630917

Table 3.

Risk of ESKD and model discrimination by different systolic BP parameters in unadjusted and adjusted analyses

Metric n=513a Unadjusted HRb (95% CI) Unadjusted c Statistic (95% CI) Adjusted HRb,c (95% CI) Adjusted c Statistic (95% CI)
Clinic systolic BP index at a single visit 1.5 (1.3 to 1.8) 0.61 (0.55 to 0.66) 1.2 (1.0 to 1.4) 0.89 (0.86 to 0.91)
Mean of all clinic systolic BP indices at up to two visits 1.5 (1.3 to 1.8) 0.61 (0.55 to 0.66), Referencea 1.2 (1.0 to 1.4) 0.89 (0.87 to 0.92), Referencea
Mean ABP wake systolic BP index 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0) 0.61 (0.56 to 0.67) 1.3 (1.0 to 1.6) 0.90 (0.85 to 0.91)
Mean ABP sleep systolic BP index 1.4 (1.2 to 1.7) 0.58 (0.52 to 0.64) 1.2 (1.0 to 1.5) 0.89 (0.86 to 0.91)
Mean of all clinic systolic BP indices at up to two visits + mean ABP wake systolic BP index Clinic:1.3 (1.1 to 1.6); ABP:1.4 (1.1 to 1.8) 0.62 (0.57 to 0.68) Clinic:1.0 (0.8 to 1.3); ABP:1.3 (0.9 to 1.7) 0.90 (0.86 to 0.92)

HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ABP, ambulatory BP.

a

No differences were noted in the c statistics of any metric compared with that for the reference group, which includes clinic systolic BPs at up to two sequential clinic visits.

b

HR reported for every 0.1 increase in systolic BP index.

c

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cause of CKD, body mass index z score, duration of CKD, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, serum albumin, hemoglobin, antihypertensive use, and baseline eGFR (by bedside Schwartz); n=496 included because of missing covariates.