Table 3.
Number | Goal for Clinical Trial | Primary End Points | Secondary End Pointsa |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Use IDBD to facilitate the creation of a phase 1 AV access (creation)b | Development of a phase 1 AV access (creation) | 1–5 |
2 | Use of an IDBD to facilitate the maturation of a phase 1 AV access to a phase 2 AV access (maturation) | Development of a phase 2 AV access (maturation) | 1–8 |
3 | Use of an IDBD to facilitate the conversion of a phase 2 AV access to a phase 3 AV access (clinical use, initial) | Development of a phase 3 access (clinical use, initial) | 2–8 |
4 | Use of an IDBD (the intervention) to address the problem of malfunction or complication occurring in a phase 4 AV access (clinical use, sustained) | ||
a | Use of an IDBD to prevent clinically significant stenosis in the hemodialysis access circuit | Primary patency of AV access over a specified period | 2–5, 9–11 |
b | Use of an IDBD to treat clinically significant stenosis (the target lesion) occurring within the hemodialysis access circuit | Postintervention primary patency of target lesion over a specified period | 2–5, 7–14 |
c | Use of an IDBD to prevent recurrent clinically significant stenosis in the hemodialysis access circuit | Postintervention primary patency of target zone over a 12-mo period (a different period may be appropriate if justified in trial design) | 2–5, 7–14 |
d | Use of an IDBD to prevent thrombosis of an AV access | Postintervention primary patency of AV access over a 12-mo period (a different time period may be appropriate if justified in trial design) | 2–5, 7–14 |
5 | Use of an IDBD (the intervention) to prevent or treat a targeted complication of an AV access (aneurysm formation, dialysis access steal syndrome, infection, etc.) | Freedom from targeted complication over a 12-mo period (a different time period may be appropriate if justified in trial design) | 2–5, 7–14 |
6 | Use of an IDBD (the intervention) to prolong phase 4 of AV access (clinical use, sustained) | Cumulative patency of hemodialysis access circuit or time to occurrence of an event that would require an IDBD intervention | 2–5, 9–11, 14 |
7 | Use of an IDBD (the intervention) to prevent or improve a specific complication or adverse outcome reported by the patient related to an AV access (pain of cannulation, convenience of cannulation, cosmetic appearance, etc.) | Failure to develop targeted patient-reported specific complication or adverse outcome over a specified period | 2–5, 9–11, 14–16 |
IDBD, intervention, drug, biologic, device; AV, arteriovenous.
Secondary end points: 1=Development of next phase in of AV-access life cycle. 2=Additional number of IDBD interventions required to achieve primary end point. 3=Incidence and types of IDBD complications. 4=Quality-of-life assessment of patients related to IDBD intervention and primary outcome. 5=Utilization of health care resources required to achieve primary end point. 6=Time required to achieve primary end point. 7=Incidence of catheter use. 8=Duration of hemodialysis catheter use and time that catheter is in place. 9=Postintervention primary patency of hemodialysis access circuit over specified period. 10=Postintervention cumulative patency of hemodialysis access circuit over specified period. 11=Time to access abandonment. 12=Postintervention assisted primary patency of target lesion over a specified period. 13=Postintervention cumulative patency of target lesion over specified period. 14=Postintervention assisted primary patency of hemodialysis access circuit over specified period. 15=Change in severity of the specific complication or adverse outcome. 16=Time to recurrence of a specific complication or adverse outcome.
Compared with the adult CKD population, the accomplishment of this end point may be different for pediatric patients, requiring IDBD interventions that are specifically targeted to this age group.