Table 2.

CTAM subscale scores

Study	Sample (10)	Allocation (16)	Assessment (32)	Control groups (16)	Analysis (15)	Active treatment (11)	Total (100)
Perich et al. (2013)	10	16	26	6	15	11	84
Bondolfi et al. (2010)	10	16	26	6	15	8	81
Crane et al. (2014)	10	16	6	16	9	11	68
Dimidjian et al. (2016)	7	10	16	6	15	11	65
MacCoon et al. (2012)	5	16	16	10	15	0	62
Gross et al. (2011)	10	16	6	10	9	3	54
Whitebird et al. (2012)	10	13	6	10	15	0	54
Day et al. (2016)	5	13	6	6	15	8	53
Cash et al. (2015)	10	16	6	0	15	3	50
King et al. (2013)	2	0	6	16	15	8	47
Speca et al. (2000)	7	13	6	0	15	6	47
Wells et al. (2014)	2	10	6	6	15	6	45
Johns et al. (2015)	2	13	6	0	9	3	33
Davidson et al. (2003)	2	10	6	0	9	3	30