Table 4.

General linear models and Poisson regression models of delinquency for the SALVe 2006 sample (n = 1457)

SALVe 2006	GLM			Poisson regression
	F	p	η 2	Wald χ2	p
Model 1a,b
Sex	122.726	< 0.001	0.088	1687.147	< 0.001
5HTTLPR	0.257	0.773	< 0.001	39.542	< 0.001
Family adversity	7.653	< 0.001	0.035	0.008	0.929
Positive family relations	2.707	< 0.001	0.033	106.757	< 0.001
5HTTLPR × family adversity	6.495	< 0.001	0.044	34.970	< 0.001
5HTTLPR × positive family relations	4.095	< 0.001	0.088	39.662	< 0.001
5HTTLPR × family adversity × positive family relations	2.370	< 0.001	0.166	131.926	< 0.001
	Adj. R2 = 0.296
Model 2a,c
Sex	73.587	< 0.001	0.059	0.021	0.886
5HTTLPR	0.421	0.657	0.001	15.007	0.001
Family adversity	8.207	< 0.001	0.040	4.752	0.029
Positive family relations	1.747	0.033	0.023	174.902	< 0.001
Sex × 5HTTLPR	3.449	0.032	0.006	22.629	< 0.001
Sex × 5HTTLPR × family adversity	4.197	< 0.001	0.073	70.346	< 0.001
Sex × 5HTTLPR × positive family relations	2.529	< 0.001	0.131	93.902	< 0.001
Sex × 5HTTLPR × family adversity × positive family relations	1.721	< 0.001	0.179	177.451	< 0.001
	Adj. R2 = 0.308

^aAdjusted for ethnicity, family subjective socio-economic status, and core symptoms of depression

^bModel 1 presenting no adjustment for sex interaction effects

^cModel 2 including the sex interaction effects