Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 13;12(1):125–136. doi: 10.1159/000479494

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with and without pancreatitis

Non-pancreatitis group, n (%) Pancreatitis group, n (%) Total (n = 704) n (%) p value
PD dilation 8 (100) 0 (0) 8 (100) 0.739
Suspected SOD 8 (100) 0 (0) 8 (100) 0.739
Cholecystectomy 37 (97.4) 1 (2.6) 38 (100) 0.581
CBD stone 80 (97.6) 2 (2.4) 82 (100) 0.355
Difficult cannulation 130 (95.6) 6 (4.4) 136 (100) 0.343
Sphincterotomy 150 (97.4) 4 (2.6) 154 (100) 0.134
Needle knife precut 23 (100) 0 (0.0) 23 (100) 0.403
PD cannulation 11 (91.7) 1 (8.3) 12 (100) 0.368
PD injection 6 (100) 0 (0) 6 (100) 0.798
Balloon dilation of sphincter of Oddi 36 (94.7) 2 (5.3) 38 (100) 0.419
CBD dialation 123 (95.4) 5 (4.6) 128 (100) 0.571
Biliary stricture 30 (93.8) 2 (6.2) 32 (100) 0.330
Biliary duct tumor 15 (93.8) 1 (6.2) 14 (100) 0.462
Peri-ampullary diverticulum 47 (95.9) 2 (4.1) 49 (100) 0.571
Medication
 Epinephrine 66 (100) 0 (0.0) 66 (100) 0.016
 Indomethacin 62 (91.2) 6 (8.8) 68 (100)
 Combination 57 (98.3) 1 (1.7) 58 (100)

ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; PD, pancreatic duct; CBD, common bile duct; SOD, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.