Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;27(1):1–12. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0244

Table 2.

Communication rates from recent BCI and conventional access to communication interfaces.

BCI method Population Selection rate Source
Berlin BCI (motor imagery) Healthy 2.3–7.6 letters/min Blankertz et al. (2006)
Graz BCI (motor imagery) Healthy 2.0 letters/min Scherer et al. (2004)
Graz BCI (motor imagery) Impaired 0.2–2.5 letter/min Neuper et al. (2003)
P300 speller (visual) Healthy 4.3 letters/min Donchin et al. (2000)
19.4 char/min (120.0 bits/min) Townsend and Platsko (2016)
P300 speller (visual) ALS 1.5–4.1 char/min (4.8–19.2 bits/min) Nijboer, Sellers, et al. (2008)
ALS 3–7.5 char/min Mainsah et al. (2015)
RSVP P300 LIS 0.4–2.3 char/min Oken et al. (2014)
RSVP P300 Healthy 1.2–2.5 letter/min Acqualagna and Blankertz (2013), Oken et al. (2014)
SSVEP Healthy 33.3 char/min Chen et al. (2015)
10.6 selections/min (27.2 bits/min) Friman et al. (2007)
AAC (row–column) Healthy 18–22 letters/min Roark et al. (2015)
LIS 6.0 letters/min
AAC (direct selection) Healthy 5.2 words/min Trnka et al. (2008)

Note. BCI = brain–computer interface; ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; RSVP = rapid serial visual presentation; LIS = locked-in syndrome; SSVEP = steady state visually evoked potential; AAC = augmentative and alternative communication; char = character.