Skip to main content

Table 2. Comparison of echocardiografic findings among the groups.

Variables Control (n = 52) Normal geometry (n = 99) Concentric remodeling (n = 80) Eccentric hypertrophy (n = 69) Concentric hypertrophy (n = 95) p value
LAD, mm 30.7 ± 3.8* 33.1 ± 4.3# 34.3 ± 3.8 34.4 ± 2.7 34.2 ± 3.7 < 0.001
LVID, mm 46.8 ± 3.6 46.4 ± 4.3 42.4 ± 3.8 49.6 ± 3.7§ 46.0 ± 3.5 < 0.001
EF, % 65.9 ± 3.9 66.1 ± 3.7 67.0 ± 4.6§ 66.5 ± 5.0 65.1 ± 4.2 0.066
IVSth, mm 9.3 ± 0.7# 9.4 ± 1.0# 10.6 ± 1.3§ 10.9 ± 0.6§ 13.4 ± 1.5 < 0.001
PWth, mm 8.7 ± 0.8# 8.4 ± 0.8# 10.8 ± 1.1 9.8 ± 0.9§ 12.1 ± 1.1 < 0.001
RWth, mm 0.37 ± 0.05** 0.36 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.03§ 0.52 ± 0.06 < 0.001
LVMI, g/m2 88.0 ± 13.9# 88.1 ± 10.6# 96.7 ± 10.8 127.1 ± 9.8§ 148.7 ± 24.0 < 0.001
E/A ratio 1.4 ± 0.24* 1.1 ± 0.36 0.99 ± 0.20§ 0.97 ± 0.28§ 0.79 ± 0.21 < 0.001
EFth, mm 5.7 ± 1.5 5.9 ± 1.6 5.9 ± 1.3 6.5 ± 1.6§ 8.9 ± 2.1 < 0.001

E/A, early left ventricle filling velocity/active left ventricle filling velocity; EF, ejection fraction; Efth, epicardial fat thickness; IVSth, interventricular septal thickness; LAD, left atrial diameter; LVID, left ventricle internal diameter; LVMI, left ventricle mass index; PWth, posterior wall thickness; RWth, relative wall thickness.

* p < 0.05 vs. NG, CR, EH and CH group; # p < 0.05 vs. CR, EH and CH groups; p < 0.05 vs. CR and EH groups; p < 0.05 vs. EH and CH groups; § p < 0.05 vs. CH group; ** p < 0.05 vs. CR and CH groups. Other abbreviations as Table 1.