Table 3. Optimization of heterogeneous DA reaction conditions between Iso and MVK a .
| Catalyst | mol% [Fe]/[MVK] | [Iso]/[MVK] | % Yield (1,4 : 1,5) b | |
| 1 | [TEA]3[In3(BTC)4] c | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 2 | [(Fp–L)0.6(TEA)2.4][In3(BTC)4] | 10 | 1 | 26 (91 : 9) |
| 3 | [(Fp–L)0.6(TEA)2.4][In3(BTC)4] | 10 | 2 | 40 (92 : 8) |
| 4 | [(Fp–L)0.6(TEA)2.4][In3(BTC)4] | 10 | 4 | 45 (91 : 9) |
| 5 | [(Fp–L)0.6(TEA)2.4][In3(BTC)4] | 5 | 4 | 21 (93 : 7) |
| 7 | [Fp–THF][BF4] d | 10 | 4 | 67 (97 : 3) |
| 8 | [Fp–THF][BF4] d | 1 | 4 | 24 (98 : 2) |
a[MVK] = 0.1 M, solvent = CH2Cl2, 25 °C, t = 96 h.
bYield and regioselectivity (in parenthesis) were determined by GC. The major product, 1-methyl-4-acetyl-cyclohexene (1,4-MeAcCyHe) was further identified by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (Fig. S40 and S41).
cSame amount of parent MOF used.
d t = 48 h.