Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 19;9(10):1782–1790. doi: 10.7150/jca.25556

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies

Author Year Study design Number Flap design Harvesting technique Timing Grade
Arnold 1977 Case report 2 Pedicle Laparotomy Delayed Very low
McColl 1979 Case report 2 Pedicle Laparotomy Immediate Very low
Phillips 1982 Case report 4 Pedicle Laparotomy Delayed Very low
Baruch 2001 Retrospective study 9 Pedicle Laparoscopy Immediate Low
Lethbridge 2002 Case report 4 Free Laparoscopy Immediate (3)/delayed (1) Very low
Han 2012 Retrospective study 19 Pedicle Laparotomy Immediate Low
Khater 2013 Prospective study 24 Pedicle Laparotomy Immediate Low
Song 2015 Retrospective study 24 Pedicle Laparoscopy Immediate Low
Huang 2015 Retrospective study 40 Pedicle Laparoscopy Immediate Low
Kim 2016 Case series 5 Pedicle Laparoscopy Immediate Very low
Yu 2016 Retrospective study 54 Pedicle Laparoscopy Immediate Low
Li 2017 Retrospective study 10 Free Laparoscopy Immediate Low
Broekhuysen 2017 Case series 6 Pedicle Laparoscopy Delayed Very low
Zaha* 2017 Retrospective study 200 Free (10)/pedicle (190) Laparoscopy Immediate Low
Song 2017 Retrospective study 7 Free Laparoscopy Immediate Low

* The same author published three articles in close succession; to avoid duplicated cases, we included only the publication with the largest number of cases.